My viewpoint is that people should have freedom of religious conscience, and with that a large degree of moral relativism with certain bounds.
Given that, is it appropriate that a country interferes with the expressed sexuality of freely consenting adults? I don’t think so.
Isn't this the history of Islam (colonization and expansion)? Were the people in those places who got conquered not forced to comply with Islamic law?
I live in former Ottoman Empire territory where slave trade of women and young boys was rampant until the Russian Empire put an end to it.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0f/Me...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_slavery#Ottoman_slave_...
>> I think your opinion is irrelevant
Even you seem to be a good representation of this kind attitude
"Feticidal injection of digoxin or potassium chloride may be administered at the beginning of the procedure to allow for softening of the fetal bones or to comply with relevant laws in the physician's jurisdiction and the U.S. federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.[4] Umbilical cord transection can also be used to induce fetal demise prior to removal.[7]"
https://www.dw.com/en/pakistan-women-tinder/a-54509792
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2261873/online-dating-catches-o...