Amazon job ad for an intelligence analyst to track 'labor organizing threats'
vice.com
vice.com
Submitted title was "AMZN scraps job ad targeting “labor, activist groups, hostile political leaders”". Please don't use titles that way. If you want to say what you think is important about an article, do so by adding a comment to the thread, so that then your view will be on a level playing field with everyone else's.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
This is not rhetorical, I want perspectives I may have missed.
My initial thought is that it Is similar to price fixing and has negative consequences, but there are perceptions of positive consequences that make it socially unacceptable to not go along with it?
Incidentally, abbreviations are not a good way to work around HN's title limit. The idea is to find a shorter meaningful title, not to use tricks to squeeze more in. This is nearly always possible.