Hacker News Reader

As beautiful as the images are, I can't help but wonder if we really want to be running loud, bright drones in the middle of the only quiet, peaceful areas that still exist.

View on HN

If it helps at all, the article mentions that the photographer uses exposures "as long as 30 seconds," so these drones aren't in the air all that long. Unless and until hundreds of copycat drone-light photographers start swarming deserts and lakes, I don't feel too bad about the light and noise pollution incurred to produce this shockingly creative landscape photography. Besides, I bet the effects of a single drone flying for a few minutes pales in comparison to the headlights, engine sounds, and emissions of the car used to get to and from the photo location.

>Unless and until hundreds of copycat drone-light photographers start swarming deserts and lakes

If a few of these start trending on twitter/instagram/whatever, there will definitely be hundreds of people doing this.

It's already hard to enjoy a trip to many places without a "bbwweeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE" reverberating overhead.

These are in a lot of places where you must get permission/ permits for any kind of commercial drone photography, and at night too, so this will probably not big as a big a nuisance as just normal people tooling around with drones wherever they live.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com