The only unconventional thing is that the function might be put in-front of the value and some parentheses need to be added, instead of just putting it after the cursor like with method syntax. I assume you get used to that rather quickly.
On the contrary, this should give Haskell an advantage because all the types are known and the IDE should be able to autocomplete only the correct parameters. But that requires compiler-as-a-service, and GHC is not. And writing your own analyser for a language is quite a task.
(the following is just what I think, I have no hard knowledge on the matter)
Language server still limits what an IDE can do. E.g., IDEA can do complex large scale refactoring and analysis over a codebase. If you're brave enough, you can write your own language analyzer that converts your language into structures IDEA understands, and you can get (some) of the same benefits. But it's a lot of work.
IIRC, language server can only provide rather superficial type information and autocompletion (which is still way more than many languages had before).
Yep. Haskell-language-server is very nice, though there are some performance issues I've experienced with a template Haskell heavy large codebase.
For many cases though, the experiences is very smooth after install.
Install issues are close to being sorted out with static binaries being downloaded in the vscode extension for instance.