> Dynamically typed languages, for example, might always be popular with technical, but not comp-sci type users.
Some of the most hardcore "comp-sci" theorists I've ever encountered work only in Scheme, a dynamically typed language.
Some of the most hardcore "comp-sci" theorists I've ever encountered work only in Scheme, a dynamically typed language.
Well, to be fair, you did use the word "always" which makes things sound... absolute.
> always be popular with users that are highly technical, but not necessarily from a comp-sci background
I edited the phrasing to make it more clear though. Apologies for anything that sounded overly authoritative. Just my opinion.