If you read the big, ~read~ red and nearly glowing banner above it you'd see that:

> Notice: sr.ht is currently in alpha, and the quality of the service may reflect that. As such, payment is currently optional, and only encouraged for users who want to support the ongoing development of the site.

There are no features to distinguish the variations by - they're all donations, effectively.

Though i admit they could improve that UX further still. But, imo - the entire product is not super polished for "mainstream users" (of which i mean nothing against), so polish in this specific area might be cart-before-horse.

Isn't the whole point that there aren't any differences? All users get the same features. You choose how much you pay.

Literally the first lines of text on the page:

> sr.ht is the hosted instance of sourcehut and provides paid services to its users. On sr.ht, all plans have access to the same features, at the same level. You should pick the plan which best matches your financial needs and best represents the level of investment you have in sourcehut.

From: https://sourcehut.org/pricing/