Hacker News Reader

Comment by jaysonelliot | Hacker News Reader

There is no law clearly defining private property rights on the moon, but you can bet that it's not going to be as easy as just showing up and starting to dig.

A couple key quotes: "The UN says that private expeditions count as national activities and are covered by the treaty, which has been signed by all the major players. Lawyers disagreed and a second agreement - the 1979 International Moon Treaty - was drawn up to explicitly ban private ownership of lunar real estate." -http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/oct/24/spaceexplorati...

"the activities of non-governmental entities in outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate State Party to the Treaty" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space_Treaty

Some good articles on trying to use the moon for private gain:

http://www.slate.com/id/2202888/

http://www.space.com/6210-owns-moon.html

View on HN

I think it is going to be "as easy" as showing up and starting to dig. The lawyers will wrangle things out in the meantime, but that's a trivial task compared to mining the Moon.

If you want to get an idea about what kind of clusterfuck is ahead, just look at the on-going Arctic dispute: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Territorial_c....

Just for the record there was a movement in '79 against the US signing the treaty: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L5_Society#Moon_Treaty.2C_decli...

Loads of people with crazy uncles and unimaginative grandmas ended up receiving titles to parcels of moon property!

http://www.moonshop.com/ - warning: 1998 wants its web design back.

They better not dig on my land!

only $19.99 !!!

Great post. But I can't help wonder how governments would stop an organisation that has sufficient technology to go and mine the moon.

A well-capitalised moon mining operation could maintain a base in space and send energy to Earth via laser beam (or whatever similar scientific approach you favour). I'm sure that governments could confiscate earth-bound assets of such enterprises, but they will presumably retaliate by keeping all their assets in space.

I think that exploitation of space (as an activity) will completely screw with our concepts of "nation" and "government". Once a private enterprise can go mine asteroids they're going to have far more capital (i.e. money) than any nation on Earth.

>> Once a private enterprise can go mine asteroids they're going to have far more capital (i.e. money) than any nation on Earth.

Private enterprises like the Rothschilds and Rockefellers have had more money than any nation on Earth for more than a century.

I'm not convinced that you're correct, but let's assume so anyway. The point I am making is that technological superiority buys you far more than mere cash. This is why I referred to "capital" and parenthesised "money". Apologies if this wasn't clear enough.

If you assume so, you'll see that the current masters of our universe will not allow a company to build the capital and technology to industrialize space, until they have the control packet. They are not stupid you see. Same thing happened with IBM, HP, Microsoft, Oracle, Google, etc.

There were many other technologies that had the potential to change the global political system, like the Internet.

I've never seen any reference saying the Rothschilds or the Rockefellers ever had more than a few hundred billion in today's dollars. Compare to the US federal budget, which is over 3 trillion per year.

I, and many others, believe Rothschilds have over 500 trillion. Plus 80% share in Bank Federal Reserve New York ...

I am currently neutral towards your assertion. Can you provide a link that tips the balance one way or the other?

Well buddy, it's up to you. My advice: do your own research and make your own conclusions. There are a number of books on Rothschilds and a ton of Google hits.

Generally to understand the history of any advanced civilization you have to follow the money. And since 1815 Rothschild have had enough capital and reputation amongst private investors to decide who rules in most countries, which country has the credit to start a war, which country/alliance has the money to win a war, etc

There are a number of books on Rothschilds and a ton of Google hits.

Dude, that's such an utter cop-out.

http://www.rense.com/general79/tril.htm (short intro into Rothschilds and how they control things)

http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.h... (timeline with narrative)

http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Bankers.htm (banking and usury timeline in general)

http://www.iamthewitness.com/doc/RothschildsTimeline.ppt (powerpoint slide deck on Rothschilds from the sources above)

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/re... (how Nathan Rothschild cornered the London Stock Exchange and became a billionaire in early 1800s).

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5352106773770802849 (Money as Debt - quintessential primer on fractional reserve banking and debt)

Money Masters - http://www.sprword.com/videos/moneymasters/

The Secret of Oz Trailer - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cq9yEVcGIU

A few more http://linkedtheory.blogspot.com/2011/02/world-economic-coll...

So you're saying that I have a super-energetic space-based laser, and that I would retaliate by stockpiling energy? I'm pretty sure I would just aim the laser at some target of strategic value and watch it melt instead.

Highly illegal, maybe... but what's the point of having a space-based laser if you don't get to unleash it from time to time upon your enemies?

Moon mining definitely violates space law.

Yeah, he's going to have to answer to the Galactic Confederacy if he wants to do this.

thats just great!! aliens havent even landed, but they are already terrorists!!

- second thought, perhaps thats why they dont want to reveal themselves: not to get jailtime!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com