> ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ฑ๐๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐๐๐ฅ๐
I'd rather see submissions stand out for their content.
The quality of this post is so high that it doesn't feel right to override any aspect of what the author created, including quirks like the title. There may be a superficial similarity to garden-variety title pimping, but as someone who bathes in spam every day I can tell you how rarely such gimmicks come attached to first-class feats of hacking prowess. Respect for content requires looking closely enough to detect truly unusual cases, pick them out of the mud, and give them a special place.
Another principle applies here too: it's good for readers to have to work a little (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...). If a title like that appears at #1 on HN, there are two possibilities: (1) this is dreck that somehow managed to evade all of the standard moderation; or (2) something's happening here and you don't know what it is. Actually, either possibility is rather interesting, and it's not hard for any HN reader to do the bit of work to figure it out. Even if it takes 20 seconds.
Hm. Not a bad idea.
Files away as an Unethical LifeHack
You can expect a bold, Cyrillic, ZALGO!อฬฬอฬบฬซฬฬคอฬผ-fied post about my next paper shortly.