Why it's so hard to find dumbbells in the US
vox.com
vox.com
> [home weight] sales usually start in the fall, hit their peak with January’s New Year’s resolutions, then taper off as it gets warmer and people are more likely to venture outside or go back to the gym.
> ...
> 95 percent of the world’s dumbbells are made in China, Logan said. To curb the virus spread, China instituted strict lockdowns from January to April;
> ...
> “It takes a month or so to get the products made and get them to the port,” Logan continued. “Then it goes from China to the United States” — landing, she says in Long Beach, California — “and then if they’re going to the East Coast, they have to go through the Panama Canal.”
> Once weights do get to America, ports, too, are subject to lockdowns and social distancing, adding even more delays.
It's not that it's "bad" to hold inventory, it's just expensive and risky. Tastes change, there's shrinkage, some things degrade over time, rents are high, and you have to finance buying/holding things you aren't selling. Obviously, just-in-time inventory isn't super resilient, but it has a ton of advantages most of the time. Perhaps it doesn't make sense for NOTHING to be stored near the point of sale, but it's not clear to me at least how that should be decided.
I think most of these don't apply to dumbbells. At least not on a short term.
Now, the shortage seems to have kickstarted small shops dumbbell production lines (which are easier to put together than kettlebells)
It does apply and is very pertinent, especially with ever decreasing operating capital in the small business sector; less predictable turnover/resupply rates and the likelihood that excess inventory turns into liabilities that can only be recovered via a liquidation process if they get it wrong is a risk that must be mitigated.
100% optimization in supply forecasting is an unobtainable panacea, but as has been seen with the asymmetric application to Gym Shutdowns, that varies by State, it reflects how uneven the reward could play out. Cost management is a huge part of Supply Chain and Logistics, so the constraints are obvious if you really take the time to analyze the situation.
I think all this underscores is the glaring single point of failure starring back at us with an entirely outsourced manufacturing infrastructure, and the inherit fallacy within it.
Gyms are open in my state, and I'm glad that they are because the buying all the machine and equipment that I use on a regular basis would require exceeding 10s of thousands of dollars, not to mention the pool and the still closed steam room/sauna I used prior to the shutdown.
> Now, the shortage seems to have kickstarted small shops dumbbell production lines (which are easier to put together than kettlebells)
Proving that the US can still manufacture despite the limited infrastructure and hollowing out of the means and resources to do so in the aftermath of Globalization.
I think what baffles me is how in my lifetime the notion of actual manufacturing-fabrication went from something that elevated so many in the US into the middle class came to be looked down upon and seen beneath an 'educated' person.
Especially because I actively participated in something where it was normal that undergrad to PhD mechanical and electrical engineers from Ivy Leagues Universities were working hand in hand with sometimes HS dropout mechanics and fabricators (on forums!) to develop better turbos and fuel mapping hardware/ECUs that were surpassing the gains of OEMs and even the well established aftermarket manufactures especially at time that it was being entirely under-served despite a significant demand that only increased with time. And then creating viable business models on those very same forums to serve as customer facing business with nothing more than a thread, a paypal account alongside a guy with tig welder a soldering gun.
Trump is an imbecile that predictably conned his way into office, and I hope he gets removed, despite the alternative not looking any better. But I really want the West to realize that the spotlight and rhetoric (mainly lip service) he put on China/CCP is warranted, and what occurred in Hong Kong is only a taste of what they're capable of and what they will do to their own kind (HK is Ethnically Han Chinese).
Reliance on such an oppressive regime is not sustainable and never ends well and the pitfalls and subsequent shortages of this centralized manufacturing infrastructure for even essential goods, like PPE, should be a much needed wake up call for manufacturing to return to at least their own continent(s).
> Or pick up 2 bricks. I did.
I resorted to filling 2 liter soda bottles and gallons with water for various lifts and isolation reps, it was a very dissatisfying experience from what I was used to but... it did help keep me somewhat fit, my upperbody PBs/Max lifts were only off by 15% by the time I went back to the gym when they reopened by mid Summer.
Sidenote: I just applied to a positions as Logistics Coordinator for a fitness equipment company, and they're currently on a 10-15 day delay on current orders. I kind of hope I can interview just to see the inner mechanics of what this all entails and where supply is being sourced from.
> Tastes change,
If you have a moderate inventory, surely they don't change that fast that you're stuck with much.
> there's shrinkage,
What's that?
> some things degrade over time,
But many don't
> rents are high,
are they (I really don't know)? How much to rent a warehouse out of town?
> and you have to finance buying/holding things you aren't selling.
But you are, they're not worthless inventory, just a buffer and you're still using them.
If you're JITting then those costs you claim will not go away, they're just passed on to your suppliers (who have to handle their pipeline/stocks) who will pass them back to you as higher prices. I don't get it.
Except your suppliers are JIT'ing, too, just as you are, for all the same reasons.
The savings may seem small to you, but if you are in a price competitive market (as is the case for most physical goods) your percentage markups are typically very small compared to what software developers are accustomed to. The grocery industry, for example, is famous for making about 2% profit margin. That means if you can shave 1% off your costs, you increase your profits by 50% in that industry. Very small optimizations can have phenomenal impacts on the risk and profitability of physical product and supply chains.
> What's [shrinkage]
Shrinkage is an industry term for items that get lost in physical supply chains. It's often hard to know what is theft and what is loss of products due to other processes like things getting misplaced, lost in shipping, accidentally shipped to the wrong customers, discarded by mistake, etc. If you run a large enough physical logistics system, you will inevitably have some amount of unexplained loss in the system. That unexplained loss is known as shrinkage, and it's a real and measurable cost in all physical industries (in the grocery industry shrinkage is about 1%, some fraction of which is theft and some fraction of which is other processes).
Then one day an inspection arrives, grabs the nearest towel (used and washed many times) and measures its length. Naturally, it's shorter than 96cm since there has been shrinkage (heh), but try explaining that to the inspecting commission! Thankfully, since it's the waffle fabric, it could be done: take a fresh new towel, count its squares, then take the used towel, count its squares, and compare the numbers.
Looks like a rather typical scenario of a market failure, isn't it? That's why national governments typically have National Emergency Reserves or something like this, but naturally, even they only stockpile really basic and absolutely necessary stuff. Dumbbells ain't one of those things.
That is a very inaccurate statement when it came to PPE, and how it was handled at even the hospital and Union Rep level where first line workers (mainly nurses) had to resort to make their own from trash bags and such only to be reprimanded, told to STFU, fired in one case one died for their ad-hoc problem solving solutions where Governments failed to provide its medical workers with these 'basic' reserves.
1: https://nypost.com/2020/05/14/nurses-union-fires-potty-mouth...
2: https://nypost.com/2020/03/25/worker-at-nyc-hospital-where-n...
3: https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2020/04/15/nur...
The secondary market is insane. People are selling rusty dumbbells for the price of copper ($3/lb) in my area. One pictured on Nextdoor had a circa 1985 Sears label on it.
If anything, COVID should be a wake-up call for the idiocy of modern manufacturing. In my business I'm having weird supply chain issues for stupid parts (think stamped metal), and I'm finding that having low-volume, custom manufacturing work done on-shore isn't as outrageously expensive as I thought it would be (I expected 300% more, paid 20%). Middlemen and Chinese manufacturers are making lots of margin on products that could be made anywhere.
These suckers can get up to 200# really easy, and are an excellent way to stay strong. Flipping one of these into a clean then front squatting it is PLENTY for 90% of people wanting to stay fit. Plus, overloaded progression is easy, just add more sand bags. Another classic is just to pick it up to one shoulder, then drop over your shoulder behind you, then repeat. Deadlifts are just picking it up to thigh height.
Add these homemade sandbags to a good rucking pack, and you're ready for an intense cardio session and strengthening routine. Just don't overdo it, rucking is really hard on tendons. Make sure to only ever increase weight or distance by no more than 10% a week.
I made a set of them for rucking, and it's amazing how fast a ruck pack gets mind alteringly heavy. At some point the brain just can't think any more. It's very enlightening.
https://www.artofmanliness.com/articles/the-prisoner-workout...
I'll add in that Burpees are real gut busters and that the 'Deck of Pain' system is aptly named yet produces results quickly. I think it's the randomization element that gives you the extra 'umph'.
Which is false, as you could always just do bodyweight exercises instead.
"You can overload the body with bodyweight, but at some point you are going to have to add more."
That may be true, but I would bet 99.9% of the people buying dumbbells aren't anywhere near that point.
The only real downside to bodyweight training is lower back.
I learned this the hard way when I got back in the gym.
In practice it sucks.
Yeah ok, sure, you can make your push-up harder or easier if you incline one way or the other. But do you have a bench that can be set to the exact height you want? All padded surfaces? Do you have enough space? Not to mention your shoulder mobility/strength which might or might not be the best one for your push-up to work on all inclinations.
Do all people have enough dexterity and strength for all bodyweight exercises? I don't think so
But yeah if you can't get what you want you'll just have to make do and work around it.
Like negative pull-ups for those who can't do a pullup yet, or knee pushups, or many others you can find on any good bodyweight routine?
Legs are extremely complicated to work out without weight. They carry your whole weight around all day so in order to make it suffer a bit, you need to add something on top of that.
You can't do biceps or any other small muscle that needs to be isolated during the workout.
lol, why dumbbells have been used for so long if they are useless ?
bodyweights exercises are quite limited, only three of them can are usefull for athletic people, dips (triceps) and pull ups( back + biceps) and handstand press (this one is very hard, shoulders). Push ups are very limited in term weight, about 50kg bench press equivalent (which is nothing). Raw squat is the same , doing 100 reps is not the same as doing 10 reps with 80kg on the back.
If you really want to exercise your legs, chest, biceps you have to use weights.
But of course if you are not into gym but only into fitness, you can do anything bodyweight
But I agree weights tend to be more efficient towards developing strength.
edit - punctuation
And one-legged variations are possible for legs which instantly doubles your equivalent weight; I believe they are also good for building up balance and stability from smaller muscles.
For chest you have push-ups and their multiple variations which most people still can’t perform correctly (even “lifters”) as well as body weight rows.
The moment you’ll be able to do even one parallel wide grip pull up which at that point is an unsupported chest row so it’s essentially a bench press in reverse just 100 times harder I’ll concede that you might be done with body weight.
For biceps just do chin-up curls, row curls or towel curls.
For legs there are a ton of them and if you think they don’t overload you well then I want to see you do even a single pistol squat.
It’s also much easier to add progressive overload by a) changing the mechanics of the exercise so you isolate muscles more effectively and b) by adding a backpack with a few water bottles filled with water or sand.
So the real issue isn’t that they aren’t effective, but that most people lack the strength, stability and range of motion to start doing them and it’s very demotivating when it might take you 4 months to do even one rep correctly. And that is without doing really hard stuff like planche which might take 2 years for an average person to do unassisted.
Overall, I found it very irritating when people repeatedly told me: "oh, gyms are closed? try pushups at home!" Gym goers are already not "most people".
And honestly i want to see a one arm pull up with and a proper one (not when you hanging willy nilly sideways) with 150% body weight that puts you not only well above the average gym but well above the elite athlete territory here is Magnus Midtbø doing one arm pull ups https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zoN4DvEpKA and there is no way he can do it with 150% bodyweight, I don't know of a single climber that ever achieved that.
I admit I was a big fun of bw workouts for 3-4 years. Until I realized that it is much easier to add another plate than dig youtube for more difficult progressions and suffer.
Pretty much the same way I can do a dozen of handstand pushups, but I have no idea how to move to one arm handstand pushup. I am not even sure I saw a video of one on youtube.
Moving through advanced progressions of bw exercises is much much more challenging than increasing number of plates on barbell. That was my whole point. I can see why people do it as sport, but it is a handicap for everyone who just wants to lift more.
You can also use a palm on the floor and forearm on the floor if you don’t have the handles or just use a book/anything to elevate one arm to reduce its range of motion and to allow you to transfer more and more weight to the other.
But for hand stand push-ups you have other ways of progression such as curling your body to reduce the center of mass and to isolate your arms, chest and shoulder more from your back and core.
I generally avoid one hand anything because it’s too easy to get injured which is one of the main issues with body weight.
Most people won’t be able to lift enough weight to get injured and unless you are doing singles/doubles you are more or less safe.
With tings like one armed handstand pushups it’s way too easy to get to a point in your range of motion where you have absolutely no chance of holding that weight in fact it’s rather easy to do it with normal hand standing pushups. There are safer options for shoulder/delts dominated pushups than hand standing ones.
E.g. I benched ~150kg when I was doing powerlifting regularly, yet I wouldn't have a chance in hell of doing a planche push-up, or quite a few simpler push-up variations.
> only three of them can are usefull for athletic people
This, however, is a very strange claim. "Athletic" means an awful lot of very different things to different people. Someone doing gymnastics for example will typically be able to do a whole lot of things that most weightlifters wouldn't be remotely close to, and they need to to be able to do the things they train for.
Like planches. Or flags. Or L-sits with rings.
I could at one point do L-sits, and the guys at my gym looked at me as if I was crazy - most of them couldn't get close to lifting their legs to 90 degrees.
I've mostly trained with barbells, but it gets pretty tiresome to see people dismiss bodyweight exercises to totally - I could lift weights most people doing bodyweight exercises can't get close to, but they can do lifts and motions where I'd be starting basically from scratch.
To call them "limited" is pretty weird to me. People who do bodyweight exercises to a high level seems to have a more versatile strength. It's just different goals.
Another issue with bodyweight training compared to free weights is training legs and hips effectively. Plenty people will be able to add resistance right away to something like a squat.
Shipping is not cheap, but you can outfit a perfectly good home gym with 3 or 4 kettlebell sizes and a jump rope.
Between the bots and r/homegym I've been able to build out a complete home gym (squat rack, bar, milspec bumper plates, echo bike, bunch of accessories, few kettle bells).
The thing that was the hardest for me to snag was the spotter arm's, they kept restocking right during my weekly sprint planning and by the time I got done would be sold out.
lol really? i guess i stopped looking in march/april when they were sold out from Rogue.
I trained with weights regularly for about 8 years before switching to bands when I became more nomadic.
Not sure about the availability, but I will attest to the quality of https://bodylastics.com/ You may also want something like TRX. Last, conbody.com has good body-weight routines.
They are a nice complement to bodyweight training, allowing you to add some resistance to bodyweight basics like the push-up or the squat (or to add assistance in the case of the pull-up / chin-up )
They are not nearly as good as free weights for certain things though. The strength curve is very different to that of a weight and it's not as easy to progressively overload (ie, add weight to) the exercises over time. You can use thicker bands, change your grip to play with the band tension or perform harder exercises (such as one-arm variations of whatever you're doing), but nothing's nearly as easy as adding heavier plates to a barbell or picking up a heavier dumbbell.
They can be a great complement to other equipment, or if you're fully sold on calisthenics / bodyweight training, they might be everything you'll ever need. If however you're into traditional strength training or bodybuilding, they will fall short fairly quickly (personally, I can't wait to get back under the bar).
[0] https://www.sierraexercise.com/
[1] https://leviticus11.com/exercise-equipment/samson-cable-set/
[2] http://yoga-horizons.com/pdfs/Fatmans-Guide-to-Cable-Trainin...
Now do office and children’s desks at IKEA...