Man I could tell some stories about that.
No one is saying taxi services are fine as-is, in addition to rideshare ride being artificially cheap thanks to VC money subsidizing costs, they did offer real user experience improvements. But the rideshare services have also shirked a lot of duties and created new externalized costs for others to bear.
The corrected version of this is "they will drive to your location some time within the next 24 hours, pick you up if you want to go to the places they want to go, and maybe accept payment in credit card".
Go on. Ask a brown person who lives by Lake Merced what it's like to try to get a taxi there from downtown.
Also, to be clear, I don't have a problem with this. I think you should have a right to transport whomsoever you desire if you can reach a consensual agreement.
But I don't think it's consensual if you ban the alternative.
Called out! But you're right, I should have been more specific.
I think it was covered well below: They are never around and have a low chance of coming if you call one, even if they say they are on the way.
https://www.sfmta.com/sites/default/files/Draft%20ManagingTa...
We also have some strict laws like a taxi must produce a receipt if you request one etc
I have, in fact, used Taxis in California. Is it easier to use Uber or Lyft? Yes. Is there absolutely no alternative as the commenter above suggests? No.
We can have a conversation around why the Taxi system sucks, if you'd like.