D developers are all experts in the art of crafting compilers and language design.
9 women can't make a baby in a month
Imagine what they can do in 19 years.
And Go, by the virtue of having less features, has to allocate quite more. Eg: Go doesn't have lazy ranges / streams. Dynamic dispatch using interfaces has to allocate memory on heap.
Also, I expect D standard library to be optimized for Non-GC use case at least a part of it, because that's one of its use cases.
Compiler's escape analysis matters too. I'm told Go's escape analysis is not very sophisticated.
Last, it may be case of missing features in D version as a comment mentioned.
I would not have predicted D would be better than Rust in any measure if those are the number of maintainers.
I'd guess that the larger team must be able to do more. "Faster alone, further together".
Go has Google's direct backing, which is more what I was pointing towards.