To be clear, it is wrongful thinking because people cannot usually grasp the vastness of billions and make their idea around their thousands as of it was the same
It isn't
Consider this
If you had a billion today and paid 1% every year in 20 years you would pay 220 millions total
In those same 20 years if you invested in a conservative way, say 4% guaranteed, which is arguably easy if you have a billion, after 20 years you would have gained 1.2 billions
In other words a net positive of one billion
Talking about numbers helps because the ratio is the same if you apply them to 1 thousand dollars
220 dollars spent, 1.2 thousands gained, 1 thousand net positive
The only difference is that making 4% with a thousand dollars is harder than with a million times a thousand dollars
Simply put you have a million 1,000 dollars chances VS Just the one
Or put it another way you could spend 1k every day for a million days, which is approximately 2,740 years, it means you could spend 10k/day for 274 years or 100k/day for 27 years or a million every day for 3 years.
And the compound interest would keep the initial billion grow indefinitely.
It basically means you have infinite money.
And you are worried that taking 1% would be detrimental for billionaires?
> If you keep reaching into their pocket they will leave
Biases are so boring... (you used a mix of confirmation bias and ancoring bias)
We are not even reaching their pockets now, they are paying less than the poor
Wake up, or you end up living worse than rich people's dogs (you probably already are right now in US)