Airbnb announces confidential submission of draft Registration Statement
news.airbnb.com
news.airbnb.com
What's confidential is the contents of the filing, not the fact.
All the initial S-1 filings I'm aware of are confidential. After amendments (S-1A filings), the resulting document can be made public. At this time, any details of offering are still volatile, and there's no reason to force companies to publish that information until the final offering details are solid.
EDIT: ohh, that changed in 2017. Now all companies can file confidentially.
Confidential S-1's are perfect for that same result.
May I ask:
1. How many data points are you talking about? (how many pieces of advice? how many advisors?)
2. (In cases where quantitative analysis makes sense) what kind of statistics have you seen around percentage error?
Lisbon and New York are just some of the cities that have made AirBNB more difficult. New York has made even a listing advertisement illegal if it's for a short-term (under 30 days) timeframe. Paris forced registrations and taxing some years back, which slashes the number of properties available. Politicians in Brooklyn constantly evoked AirBNB these past few years in gentrifying neighborhoods. Barcelona has had protests.
In an era of affordable housing becoming an issue, someone profiting off of short term sublets at the expense of longer-term residents (who have to deal with noise issues in addition to more scarcity of housing) will be targeted politically. Will COVID and the move from the cities offset that?
edit: Basically they're offering landlords incentives to rent to the city which rents to workers and students. The article says that's 2000 apartments off the AirBNB (or "short term") platforms. That's some serious revenue.
Other cities and countries are also mentioned in this article, which is a few days old. It seems cities are taking advantage of the pandemic to pull housing back from AirBNB. The bear thesis gets stronger.
Makes me want to short the stock when it IPOs, after its initial run-up out of vengeance.
There are going to be legitimate reasons for removing a review like bad writing, personal information, or foul language, but the net effect is making the listing appear better than it is, and that doesn't sit well with me.
I used to have 5 star experiences and my last few were pretty negative, ranging from disgusting, to bad locations (not allowed to criticize location in reviews so you'll never know), to a toilet which required pushing things with brush. And more expensive than hotels.
Lyft in particular offered some deranged predictions thinking this sort of market is sustainable and reaching "profitablity in 2021". This was them last year [0], this was them four months ago [1], and this is them now [2]. They seem to have used a malfunctioned crystal ball for that prediction.
Airbnb seems like they are now escaping for an IPO, but I'd rather short the stock until it reaches below its IPO price. This virus is not going away any time soon.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21328871
For ebay they did not take a cut of the shipping cost(typically their cut was around 10% of the final sale of an item) so sellers would list items at rock bottom prices but with shipping like 5x of what it should be so they could receive a maximum amount of money. I assume airbnb does not take a cut of cleaning costs?
It’s made me go back to hotels where you can usually cancel pretty freely.
There’s probably nothing you can do about that.
There’s so much uncertainty with traveling these days.
I mean there are lots of city people escaping .. but how likely will that continue as cabins and beachhomes become too cold.
Though neither survive a complete travel collapse.
Branson had to dig into his purses to bail out Virgin recently. Layoffs are periodically occurring in the air travel world. No one knows precisely when it ends.
What does "priced in" mean? Some sort of perfect market pricing thesis manifesting or am I reading into it?
But check the AirBNB reddit group for discussions by hosts on the topic, do some searches, there are instructions and hints for how to remove negative reviews. In summary: it's trivial.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/AirBnB/search/?q=removing%20review&...
"ButchDeal Host5 points · 5 months ago
A little relevant comment in an otherwise mostly irrelevant review will not stop support from removing it. level 5 jackasseress 0 points · 5 months ago
This is simply not true level 6 ButchDeal Host2 points · 5 months ago
actually it is. I have had 4 removed (2 from early last year which were the hardest to do as they were from before the new policy ;) I also head up a local host support group for AirBnB and helped others get some removed as well.
It is in the discretion of the case worker but they have quite a bit of discretion on this, though just with other things occasionally you get a poor support person but I and others have gotten things removed."
(https://www.reddit.com/r/AirBnB/comments/fdyeim/damning_revi...)
Here's a one month ago experience similar to mine: https://www.reddit.com/r/AirBnB/comments/hg8tmy/my_opinion_o...
Here's a two year-old echo chamber of hosts: https://www.reddit.com/r/AirBnB/comments/73kdk9/airbnb_remov...
A recent echo-chamber dismissal of neg reviews removed: https://www.reddit.com/r/AirBnB/comments/i7jzby/i_had_a_revi...
Someone was edited: https://www.reddit.com/r/AirBnB/comments/3a1mgu/airbnb_edite...
https://www.reddit.com/r/AirBnB/comments/hed9xa/can_you_requ... Conversation about 'new review policy'
On the other hand, they're still in money saving mode, reducing ad spending and laying people off.
Anyone know what is going on?
In 2018 they sued Groupon for $167m and got $83m.
Interesting quotes from an article [0] reporting on it include:
> In 2017 IBM generated about $1.2 billion in revenue from its licensing activities.
> An IBM licensing executive testified that Amazon, Facebook, Google, LinkedIn and Twitter have each paid IBM $20 million to $50 million as part of cross-licensing deals that gave them access to the patent portfolio.
> IBM lawyer John Desmarais told jurors the company had no choice but to sue after Groupon refused to take responsibility for using IBM’s foundational technology.
> “The verdict is a vindication for IBM’s licensing program,” Desmarais said by phone.
It looks like they've been at it for a while, too. They sued Amazon in 2006 [1]. Quotes from that reporting:
> IBM alleges that Amazon.com knowingly exploits its intellectual property by infringing on several patents that cover, among other things, the presentation of applications in an interactive service, the storage of data in an interactive network, the presentation of advertising in an interactive service, and the ordering of items from an electronic catalog.
While doing some digging, I stumbled across this [2] super interesting scoop on how IBM views and remunerates successful patent-applicant-employees, from 2001. Makes sense to give out bonuses for patents, when they weaponize them this way.
Gross. :/
[0]: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ibm-groupon-lawsuit-idUSK...
[1]: https://www.computerworld.com/article/2547652/ibm-sues-amazo...
[2]: https://www.eetimes.com/ees-want-a-bigger-piece-of-patent-ro...
> Thes patents at issue are used primarily in e-commerce—and some of them date back to the time of dial-up technologies such as Prodigy.
Dial-up era!? Patents shouldn't last that long! This is centuries in technology!
I think the only valid use for software patents (if there are any at all), is to prevent bigger players from moving into your space. But small companies don't have the time, energy, or money to wage fights in the courtroom. They have pressing existential issues.
Companies without products are patent trolls and shouldn't be permitted to have them. If you "invent" yet don't do anything with it, what good are you to society?
Ossified and decaying companies like IBM shouldn't be allowed to trample upstarts.
It's all so backwards.
1. Hotels are still in the dumps.
2. Single home rentals, a la VRBO and AirBnB, are doing fantastic as people decamp from urban areas and work remotely.
3. Urban rentals are in the shitter.
4. Shared spaces are also in the shitter.
AirBnB has a lot more urban inventory and shared spaces than for example VRBO (which was always more based around vacation destinations), but I have no idea if their split between urban and vacation destinations is an overall boon or hindrance for them.
1: https://shorttermrentalz.com/news/sonder-series-e-round-june...
Hotels basically are either closed for renovation or jacked up the prices while closing down everything that they had as an advantage over AB&B.
The restaurant is closed, there is no room cleaning unless you explicitly book it a day in advance, the gym, spa and pools are closed and so are all other in-house attractions and services such as the children play areas, lounges, media rooms etc.
So you have higher prices than pre-pandemic in many places due to them having to recoup their losses and a much much much worst service than usual which already in many places in Europe was a hit and miss outside of the large resorts and world renowned hotels the hotel service and overall quality in Europe is pretty shite.
Hilton, Marriott, etc all still have MASSIVE amounts of physical property that they have to maintain year around no matter if they are full or empty. Airbnb has none of those costs.
This makes them more flexible and are able to quickly respond to changes in the travel market, more so than their traditional competitors
Hilton Certainly does under several of its brands.
This Franchise model does not change my statement really at all, as it is far different model than what airbnb has
As an anecdote, I had an Airbnb stay in Rome but the landlord went bankrupt due to Covid and had to close the business.
It's only one datapoint of course but from this very limited perspective it seems very hard for me to believe that their business would be stronger now than pre-covid.
But hotels are probably suffering even more, that's true.
Presuming Airbnb makes it through the crisis, they're set up for many quarters of blistering earnings "growth" as things return to normal.
I'm now in the process of choosing between 2 houses both in the most exclusive part of the city centre, a thing I could only dream of until few months ago, at the same price I was renting an apartment in Milan in an average neighborhood
Most of the listings are former Airbnb places, you can tell when you visit the houses that packing up so many beds to maximize profit didn't pay, that level of service could only be acceptable by youngsters looking for a cheap place to crash during the two nights spent in Rome with friends, but it actually lowered the real value of the apartments a lot, to the point that many of them are corridors with the same number of rooms and bathrooms, but not a living room or a kitchen, hence impossible to live in unless you enjoy suffering.
Unfortunately for them young tourists and cheap flights will not come back for at least a few years
So now their properties are basically worthless
Agencies that were managing the properties have abandoned the business or are selling their licenses (good luck with that!) and owners have to face the choice of renewing and waiting at least next year to start renting again or lower the prices and avoid more losses, but accept a long term contract which binds them for at least 3+2 years
As I said many of them are not worth it even if the rent went down considerably so it's not even easy to rent in this economy, even owning an apartment in a super exclusive neighborhood rented at half the price, also considering that people who can afford it don't pay for shitty places full of sofa-beds and cheap furniture.
all the listings say the same thing "NO AIRBNB, NO HOLIDAY RENTALS, NO AGENCIES" they only want to deal with medium-long term rentals with trusted people after checking their income.
I'm quite sure even after covid airbnb and all the businesses around it won't come back, at least not in Rome, not in the same way, people are fed up with mass tourism and businesses are starting to enjoy working more with locals who actually live in the neighborhood, like it used to be not so long ago, but were forced to leave by the "tourist-pay-double-for-shit" craze.
It happened and until it worked, it worked, but when it stopped it left ruins
I think people have opened their eyes
Airbnb will still be the preferred way to rent a van on a beautiful beach on a Greek island where a couple can spend few romantic nights, but the idea that it was going to improve the fabric of our old cities is dead IMO
Business travel is done, but this is where a huge amount of airline and hotel profits come from. Travel is dirt cheap right now because, at least in the US, airlines have to fly. They can't lay off employees or reduce staff until, currently, end of September. But once they can I suspect we'll see very different behavior for airlines.
Beyond that we still haven't started to feel the full impact of all the job losses, and the people who remain employed but at substantially lower rates, or in more volunerable positions.
The relatively young travelers that make up a lot of AirBnb's business, have largely not been concerned about the virus, certainly aren't concerned about future economic impacts and have mostly seen cheap flights with hotels unwilling to book so they head to a rental.
These are travelers whose optimism is based on a decade+ of perpetual economic growth. Even those losing their jobs don't really believe that there can be a prolonged period where it's hard to find work.
I believe that this coming Fall will bring a lot of reality to the forefront. I suspect leadership at AirBNB has similar thoughts and wants to get that IPO before the buzzer.
The WARN letters for October 1 layoffs have all already gone out. They needed to be out before August 1st. So we'll know of any further layoffs with two months notice.
Pagerduty was a letdown, though.
It's a see-saw here. The lower it goes the lower it will go.
This is a train that went away a long time ago. AirBNB is slowing down and becoming the yellow pages/TripAdvisor of the internet (that is very clear in terms of the commodification of the review process).
It doesn’t mean they will fail, however you can’t just state they will grow forever.
Not sure how this has anything to do with the network effect point I brought up. I definitely never stated they will "grow forever", I said the network effects of their platform are a sort of moat.
Do you have a source for AirBNB slowing down?
Any marketplace will benefit from network effects. The devil is in the extent to which you can take advantage of these. And you made no points about that.
Do you have the source about the slowdown? Really curious.
The network effect is not that of Facebook where you would have to convince all your friends and family to sign up and start using a new site/app.
I suppose they could just buy the competitor like Facebook does, assuming another large corp is not behind it.
Though, I agree the network effect here isn't as strong as for a social network.
That stickiness goes away when a credible competitor steps in.
I think if an organization like Google were to start listing similar listing on Maps alongside hotels, they'd be done for. If a competitor were to start with listings on several major travel websites (and easy way to do that is by taking them on as investors), that would also overcome any such moat.
I think whether they do okay or not depends more on the credibility of the competition than on any moat.
They're a pretty shady experience as a guest, so on a personal level I'm upset (per other comment). There's a pandemic and economic catastrophe, so there's a good bear argument that adds to the already bear argument that cities around the world are cracking down on AirBNB rentals because they're easy political targets.
Also with business travel being depressed for quite some time I doubt many business travelers would be looking to Airbnb to get a deal when hotel prices will be depressed for the foreseeable future.
[0] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/technology/airbnb-employe...
[1] https://www.teamblind.com/post/Early-AirBnB-Employees-IPO-NB...
But all things considered, it's pretty clear that everything is too volatile right now, but AirBnB is being pressured to IPO anyway. If the market doesn't have an appetite for travel, I foresee a lot of recent AirBnB hires taking a huge haircut on their total comp.