https://www.ft.com/content/a2901ce8-5eb7-4633-b89c-cbdf5b386...
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/17/upshot/corona...
https://www.ft.com/content/a2901ce8-5eb7-4633-b89c-cbdf5b386...
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/17/upshot/corona...
US's response to covid-19 was better than all countries in the whole of Europe?
Or, did you mean to say the US's response was better than Europe's, on average?
In what way was it better?
But, in reality, they're dying in their homes because Americans are too afraid of surprise hospital fees ruining their entire life.
> Our response was better than Europe's
Americans had the brunt of the European and Chinese outbreaks to observe, learn, and listen, but none of these things come easy to us, so we instead decided to sacrifice our non-remote workers.
Also, according to the ECDC, there have so far been 179,793 total deaths in the EU [1] vs 169,870 in the US [2]. In terms of cases 1 946 748 for the EU, 5,422,242 for the US. Keep in mind the population of the EU is roughly 40% larger than the US.
We could also probably start looking into food insecurity rates increasing, eviction rates increasing, widespread civil unrest, but, hey, why throw more tinder onto the fire? The response has been exceptional, but in a brutally American way.
[1] https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/cases-2019-ncov-eueea [2] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/case...
The idea here is: if you have a substantive point to make, make it thoughtfully; if you don't, please don't comment until you do. That goes regardless of how wrong someone else is or you feel they are.
Heart disease kills 647k people per year, for consistency shouldn't we also mandate exercise and outlaw junk food?