The life-changing love of Paul Dirac (2015)
theconversation.com
theconversation.com
Paul Dirac, an absolutely brilliant man, decided early on that his life "was mainly concerned with facts and not feelings." In a sense he planned his life out with imperfect information--as we all do--until something came along and completely turned his life around, in this case his future wife.
I think that's a hopeful message? That your life and your thoughts are limited by all that has happened to you, not by what hasn't happened to you yet, by definition, because you can't imagine a future that hasn't happened to you. I know, anecdotally, a handful of people who swore off marriage in their 20s, only to turn right around and get married in their 30s after meeting somebody who changed their minds. The same is true for academics and, really, everything--a student who resigns himself to hating math until he finds a teacher who understands his feelings, etc.
Or maybe it's late and I'm rambling. Either way, I really enjoyed reading this essay.
The article briefly suggested that love was not something Dirac had received from his family, so he likely didn't know. If he indeed was a strange outsider among his peers and only read technical books, I can see how he managed to go so many years without developing much desire for an emotional connection with someone else.
It's not mentioned in the article, but I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that his reticence to engaging with Manci was probably the result of one or more terrible experiences with women which were likely caused by his social awkwardness.
I feel like "rationality" is really a mask that people use to avoid addressing difficult emotions like this. Growing up to be socially stunted is a very difficult handicap to deal with. Not least of all because it's imperceptible to the very people it effects.
High achieving scientists tend to start by focusing on logic and "reason", and that's why they become high achieving.
But there is no reason not to explore our humanness later in life.
Even if MBTI is regarded as pseudoscience, as an INTJ, I know that later in life I must explore and improve my not so developed soft skills, and it only feels natural.
https://www.eclecticenergies.com/enneagram/test
https://www.reddit.com/r/Enneagram/comments/dc4g4i/a_compreh...
- Schopenhauer
I see what you did there .... :D
It makes some sense, it is a biography of Dirac, but felt strange at the time.
The socially incompetent techie who is rescued by love from his rationality.
I dont wanna guess how many readers here secretly hope for this event to occur at some point. Like in the story, ideally they'd not even have to court the woman. She would just appear and take care of them. Cliché!
Chris Knight is Mitch’s pixie dust, not Jordan. “I couldn’t figure out where to hang your sports coats,so, i threw them out. I’m chris knight!” “oh no” “oh yes!”
This line is like something out of a movie.
we accept people of different sexual orientations. we should accept people of all emotional orientations too.
"Feelings" are part of the human condition. They're worth some work.
people say things - even in their autobiographies - that they dont fully subscribe to. they worry about how they will be perceived for their true feelings.
I cannot understand why we idle discussing religion. If we are honest—and scientists have to be—we must admit that religion is a jumble of false assertions, with no basis in reality. The very idea of God is a product of the human imagination. It is quite understandable why primitive people, who were so much more exposed to the overpowering forces of nature than we are today, should have personified these forces in fear and trembling. But nowadays, when we understand so many natural processes, we have no need for such solutions. I can't for the life of me see how the postulate of an Almighty God helps us in any way. What I do see is that this assumption leads to such unproductive questions as why God allows so much misery and injustice, the exploitation of the poor by the rich and all the other horrors He might have prevented. If religion is still being taught, it is by no means because its ideas still convince us, but simply because some of us want to keep the lower classes quiet. Quiet people are much easier to govern than clamorous and dissatisfied ones. They are also much easier to exploit. Religion is a kind of opium that allows a nation to lull itself into wishful dreams and so forget the injustices that are being perpetrated against the people. Hence the close alliance between those two great political forces, the State and the Church. Both need the illusion that a kindly God rewards—in heaven if not on earth—all those who have not risen up against injustice, who have done their duty quietly and uncomplainingly. That is precisely why the honest assertion that God is a mere product of the human imagination is branded as the worst of all mortal sins.
Dirac solved this error as best as a child could: by not speaking. This trauma lasted to his death.
Someone will now say "citation needed", and to those people I give these 2 books to read and what I wrote above will become as clear as day.
Alice Miller: The Drama of the Gifted Child
Alice Miller: The Body Never Lies
I like this because it generally asserts that anyone, even someone as apparently closed off as Dirac, can find love and/or happiness.
Wigner:
How much did you talk to your parents?
Dirac:
Very little. My father made the rule that I should only talk to him in French. He thought it would be good for me to learn French in that way. Since I found that I couldn’t express myself in French, it was better for me to stay silent than to talk in English.
Source: https://www.aip.org/history-programs/niels-bohr-library/oral...
People with high IQs, who win Nobel prizes are more complex than the average joe. Their motivations, inspirations and behaviour, perhaps, needs a different perspective than normal analysis.
Its a wonderful article, but seems to suggest that his human nature was non existant, rather than hidden. This I find is unbelievable. Perhaps he never had a chance to truly explore his human side, mainly because those who tried to make him explore were not patient nor persistant.
Not much to say... Life is meant to be lived. Don't forget to live it.
I don't understand how this is supposed to be some kind of heart warming story. I mean.... maybe it was something nice for Dirac, but it sounds as much like a ruthless sociopath hunting a the man down like a zebra on the Serengeti plain. I guess there were kids at least! But otherwise there's no indication Dirac ... was any more (or to be fair less) happy afterwords.
As opposed to Erdős, where we know what happened when he kicked speed for a month.