I love the fake papers. I think it is necessary, like a Snowden move, to expose how bad publications are at weeding out bad data and conclusions. It only serves to make the publishers look bad, not the writers.
And anyone publishing in it is either hopelessly naive and without support from an experienced researcher, or just publishing there to put publications on their CV, knowing that the paper will likely accept anything you throw at them.
I have read very few strange things on Pubmed, but still some seems out of place in a medical/biology publications repository [0-2], so I have a question about indexation on Pubmed, is it possible to tweak this indexation to make it more stringent?
[0] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28366104/
Hiding the fact that you're vulnerable doesn't make you secure. "Hacking is illegal", yeah, but you'll be hacked. -> Don't sue researchers!