Unfortunately, it is accurate to the questionable nature of that debate.
I took it in the spirit of questioning one’s questions, and thought it was rather good. Russellian, even. Judging from the general reaction in here this may just mean I’m a dim bulb with a bad sense of humor.
You're fine. HN is uniquely unsuited to judging the quality of humor.
I laughed out loud.
It’s so unfunny it caused me to start pondering issues regarding the breakfast I’ve just sat down to eat.
Maybe universities should teach satire as a form of a scientific investigation. I first wanted to write that it should be acknowledged as a proper form of inquiry at least in philosophy. After further consideration, I'd say it should be a mandatory building block for all students.