Do you have to press some obscure keyboard shortcut?
Do you have to press some obscure keyboard shortcut?
I found "Polish international" [1] layout which honestly can be perfect for many people. It's optimized to be compatible with regular Polish keyboard (hence with US keyboard too), and maybe not the fastest if you type a lot special chars, but it's extremely intuitive:
ï = AltGr+:, i
ü = AltGr+:, u
é = AltGr+/, e
è = AltGr+\, e (since it's extremely common, also aliased as AltGr+w)
If you're Windows based and want US-compatible keyboard layout that allows easily typing any special chars, I highly recommend it.
[1] https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=pl&tl=en&u=https%3...
The Alt-13x codes are not as quick as the Azerty keys, but good enough and once memorized are fairly easy with a keyboard that has a keypad (most PCs do, even my laptop). This is especially true because they are done with both hands simultaneously, as opposed to something like Cmd-e+e on a Mac. Actually, they are faster than finding the accented characters on my QWERTY virtual keyboard as I type this comment on iOS.
Those AltGr- combos seem complicated to me, I would much prefer a system such as AltGr-e =é, then AltGr-ee=è, AltGr-eee=ê, etc. To me that would be more intuitive than remembering the composing character (slash for aigüe, etc).
In macOS, you can either use Command-u (for "umlat") followed by i, or hold down the i key for a second and press 2 to select the ï from the pop-up menu.
option-u (aka alt-u).
Generally speaking, command is for application-level or os-level commands, control is for text edition, and alt is for alternate characters (all can be shifted and command "overrides" the rest).
This has happened with every single Apple keyboard I've ever used. I suspect it's my fault, since I'm a key pounder, having learned to type on an IBM Selectric typewriter.
It's not very clear why the Swedish keyboard has that key, since ä and ö each have their own keys. The layout has other quirks as well, such as keys for §, ½ and the useless "currency sign", ¤.
BTW, the dead key could be from german, for writing their U:s.
It wouldn't have been much of a bother, had I not used the key as my Emacs leader...
On Linux there is also a "US alternate international" layout with some extra dead keys to make it easier to do things like š or ž (Ctrl-RightAlt-< followed by s or z, respectively).
It's always something easy to remember, like " for umlauts, o for circles (©, ®), obviously ' for accents (ń) and so on.
Also, Qt5 broke support for multi-character results when using compose sequences (everything after the first character is ignored).
The New Yorker writing things like coöperate and reëlect is probably the most infamous, although they are not the only ones.
The Guardian style guide says to use spellings exposé, lamé, résumé, and roué – but not café. Although, when giving the name of an organisation/institution (restaurants and cafés included), the article should use whatever spelling is preferred by the management, including their choice about how to spell cafe/café (when that word is part of their name).
Personally, I'd always write café in formal English, because cafe just looks wrong to me. However, in something informal like a text message I probably wouldn't bother.
FWIW, Economist explicitly names Naive as one to use without diacritic: https://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/store/S...