>
Point to point kit is cheaper till you get to the customer-facing aggregation, at which point per-port cost of PON vs PtP is much more in PON's favour, and PON customer kit is very cheap from benefits of scale.Is there a cross-over point when one becomes cheaper than the other? Total number of customers, customer per kilometre run, customer/population density, other?
> PON on the other hand isn't good for long range links.
There are certainly 'traditional' Ethernet AOM optics that can reach 40 and even 80 km (before getting into the long-haul stuff from the likes of Ciena), but given that most PONs seem to reach at least 20 km for not-outrageous splitter ratios (1:8 ~ 40km, 1:16 ~ 25-30km, 1:32 ~ 15-20km), how far does one actually need to go for most fibre runs?
A recent video on Utopia Fibre has them using AON, and they claim it ended up generally being cheaper:
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2e9DNwInTE4
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Telecommunication_Open_In...