I believe the satellites are moving, so there's no "Wyoming satellite customers" in the same way as existing satellite internet. The Wyoming customers will be sharing satellites with several other places as they move in and out of their regions
So you have a limit on the number of satellites and the number of customers per satellite.
The article says 5 million in the USA. That makes sense given what I'm thinking. That's about 100,000 per state, but it's not going to work like that. It's a good ballpark for the service they'll provide.
My main point, is if it's 100K per (1/50th the US) there will be less bandwidth in cities than in rural regions.
This is a HUGE boon to rural areas and will be amazing.
This will probably not affect you if you are urban or even suburban.
While there is limit to number of connections per sat that applies to any routing equipment really, there is not much limit to how many sats can be there .
Sure spectrum is limited today ,however if 5million people use it already, other spectrum could be freed up for this purpose , if there is demand .
The constellation today is not ready for high density usage , it is not that it will never be ready .
They are planning on picking off the users who cable has to run the furthest to off of the ISPs not the close users. If we started spreading out evenly I could see this, but while we've got the population density we do, I don't see this happening.
Each house will interfere with it's neighbor, the more they spread the easier it is.
>The constellation today is not ready for high density usage , it is not that it will never be ready .
I am no sith, I shouldn't speak in absolutes. But, I'd bet that this technology won't disrupt ISPs within 50 miles of a city. I hope it would, but I don't see that happening.