109 Year-old IBM is planning to take on Amazon. Here's how
lite.cnn.com
lite.cnn.com
Buddy of mine worked at a big bank and was required to use IBMs "cloud".
He went to try spinning up a server just to get familiar with the UI. The UI was weird to do so and he got a message to check his email... nothing on the page but that.
He checks his email and it looked like his action fired off an automated email that was responded to by an automated email that the server would be setup in a week or so....like some old colocation service... that was their cloud...
I'm sure provisioining resources within the supplied hardware would be fast as any, and maintains privacy by default for apps where others can charge up to $40/hour/instance
Cloud got rid of all of that. These days you sign a contract, and cherry pick what resources you need from a shopping list, and it's all provisioned in the background, and then deprovisioned when you don't need it anymore. Behind the scenes its all the same stuff it used to be, but now it's all wrapped up in a single service.
Companies love cloud because it means they no longer need a large infrastructure team to manage the server stuff which is a saving, along with the more fluid pricing model - also a saving.