Agreed, but neither does it make it a scam. Any input he has on the subject is compromised and basically meaningless as evidence one way or the other. So we really should avoid citing him.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattperez/2019/05/01/exclusive-...
So you're saying because it's still in dev and still raising money, so it's not a scam?
At no point have I weighed in on if it is a scam or not. All I am saying is that citing Derek Smart as an authority on the matter is not really a good idea either way. He is hugely biased and is basically praying it fails.
Citing other, probably less biased sources? Great, go ahead.