I got downvoted to oblivion a few months back for suggesting that maybe cars were just getting more aerodynamic. I still wonder if anybody has really considered that. I assume so, it seems like a plausible first guess.
Now, consider that there has been massive human migration into urban areas over the last century, plus cars getting far more aerodynamic in the last 40 years, and I think you can make a case for observation bias. However, I think you can also say very firmly that urban areas = less insect populations, so as our urban footprint grows, it is likely costing us. I think suburban sprawl may be even worse, because of the habitat destruction your typical housing development causes without the benefits of density that a truly urban environment offers.
So honestly I think you could be right and wrong at the same time. It is definitely worth correcting for.
[0]: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/feb/12/car-spla...
Now that I've made my comment, I'll go read that article. Thanks for sharing ;-)