> also don't see who benefits from this.
Long term society by establishing that Uber doesn't get to write the law and dodge their responsibility as an employer. It's about time they get knocked down a notch after their campaign against DeBlasio.
Long term society by establishing that Uber doesn't get to write the law and dodge their responsibility as an employer. It's about time they get knocked down a notch after their campaign against DeBlasio.
Right now is a terrible time to wipe out the gig economy. So many people are turning to it and it is creating value. Economic/employment changes like this one are best suited when the market is strong because people job mobility is higher etc.
The court doesn't have an option to "wait" just because it's a recession.
Uber doesn't have a choice to "wait" because this ruling is going to go into effect in ~10 days unless the stay is extended.
[0] - https://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/dynamex-operations-west-...
If you drive delivering beverages, whether you're an employee or contractor under AB5 depends on whether or not that beverage is milk.
I don't see why they couldn't have anything in there for rideshare.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm...