The study has been criticised by German scientists for this reason. With rather drastic words, e.g. "I don't understand how a paper with such obvious weaknesses can pass through the peer reviewing process" and "This paper is not a good example for scientific best practices".
A few careers ago, some agribusiness dude asked me why I opposed the introduction of nonnative species, given that I was concerned about biodiversity loss.
"If one person eats a chicken and another person doesn't eat anything, on average they both ate half a chicken"
Or in a similar way something like:
"If I eat two chickens and you eat none, statistically we both ate one"
Not sure where I heard that.
Also, the average human has less than two legs and less than two arms.
[0] http://www.fotografi.org/studi_settore/polli_di_trilussa.htm