Available for preorder today, Surface Duo
blogs.windows.com
blogs.windows.com
Unfortunately this device just isn’t made for 2020 (or 2017) usage: small battery with no wireless charging, not waterproof, no NFC (aka no wireless payments), questionable/unproven camera, processor with 2017 specs driving two screens.
On top of all that, surface has particularly bad hardware reliability. Of the devices I’ve owned, each has had to be factory serviced. My Nokia phones from the windows phone 8 era all needed to be factory serviced. And all that for the low price of two iPhones.
Sadly this is yet another innovative device that will be killed by making the wrong trade offs. I expect it to be copied and executed much better by Apple or maybe Samsung (I tried the Note 10 recently and the stylus is much better than the surface pen).
There is a good chance this will replace my laptop for ~75% of my work, which is dominated by meetings, not focused work time.
An average day for me is 50%+ meetings and the rest of the time is spend coordinating actions (slack, text, emails, JIRA boards, Aha, etc.) as a result of those. Right now I bounce around between a laptop (Surface Pro) and a paper notebook. I could also probably do most of my job with an iPad Pro but the idea of the split screen appeals to me enough for me to overcome the switching cost that, for whatever reason, the iPad Pro did not.
Having a decade old note taking system that I still actively use inside of OneNote is also a contributor to my interest. My biggest fear for the Duo is that the stylus experience is subpar, so I'll certainly be trying that out first.
But its doubtful Neo would see its light and even if Microsoft released a tablet with Windows 10 IMO it's again getting into the same mess of Windows Phone era. If Neo gets successful, it would likely need to release a smartphone with Windows 10 and if Duo gets successful it would need to scale it up to tablet(which is what likely to happen).
>My Nokia phones from the windows phone 8 era
I concur, I bought a Lumia 640 for development of our app for Windows Phone ecosystem. One day I used a different charger (Of same spec) and the phone charging port went kaput; Searching the web, it seems to be a very common problem but MS never bothered to call back the devices. But, there are similar stores for Google Nexus line of devices and I think for early Pixel devices too.
The reliability issues are bordering on a dealbreaker for me at this point. I've had lots of Microsoft hardware; maybe I'm just unlikely, but the only thing that didn't need factory service was an Xbox One. I'm not a Microsoft hater by any stretch, but having to get a Zune 80, Surface 3, Surface RT, and Xbox 360 factory serviced really soured me. I've had several Android and Apple devices at this point and none have needed factory service.
Windows 10 still isn't tuned well for mobile, and the few parts that are just aren't generally reliable. I'm actively working on a UWP app right now and the problems are endless - issues with resizing windows, crashing when themes change (built in apps like Maps have the same issues so its not my code), broken vector icon rendering, etc. The whole thing is based on COM, which tends to lead to leaky abstractions when exposed through higher-level APIs. It is hard enough to make high-quality software on Windows that developers often fail and it leads to weird quirks. Even with traditional desktop apps, getting things like maximize behavior right with customized windows is actually very hard (see Slack, Teams or VS Code on a high/mixed DPI setup).
Here's a small taste of what a modern Windows developer gets to deal with, to accomplish the simple task of displaying a vector icon: https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/issues/1494
Until then it is back to ATL style programming manually editing IDL files, copying and merging the generated outcome.
While forcing .NET devs to keep using C++, now C++/WinRT, because Windows team won't provide WinRT variants of COM based libraries like DirectX.
Sometimes I wonder who is in charge of such decisions.
I don't want to sound negative (and have to admit I don't represent the whole population) so if this appeals to you, can you explain to me why please ?
As much as I dream of the day where you will be able to just change your screen size on a whim, we don't have the tech yet.
And it seems to me that if you need more screen estate, you will just get a tablet, not an hybrid ?
The problems for me: 1. It runs android. While I hope that MSFT will support it into the future, I fear if it flops that the dual screen setup and support is going to dwindle over time.
2. No pen slot. This is a huge fail IMO - one of the main ways I would want to use this is as a small digital notebook. Having to carry a surface pen separately kind of sucks.
3. No external display. I know they are already pushing it price wise, but even just a small OLED strip would suffice, to let you see a notification without having to unfold the device to see what it is. Missing this makes me think this will be a terrible phone - to know who is calling you now have to take it out of your pocket, open it, then choose what to do.
The problem is I think the $400 iPad Mini likely outclasses this device in terms of software and performance.
I'm definitely interested, though of course I'm not 100% sure it'll fit my needs until I actually try it for a week. The pricing is also iffy. I'm not sure I'm willing to give such an expensive device a try, especially with Microsoft's poor record when it comes to QA on their Surface line in general.
The universal feedback I've seen from peers who are considering the pre-order is: I can stop carrying around an iPad.
$1399 replaces an ipad and a phone for them. Time will tell if the usability matches their expectations.
For that reason, seeing Marc Levoy calling it quit at Google makes me pessimistic for the next pixels.
to be fair the 4 was already a bit underwhelming in that area (flagship level camera but unlike the previous generations it did not really push the enveloppe).
I just gave it a quick DDG, and it looks like that still means my only option is iPhones (or 3rd-party apps on Android, but I am very skeptical the experience & results with those would be anywhere near as good).
Android has been having this for a pretty long while as well, at least on pixel. Off the top of my head, no idea if this applies to the whole ecosystem (might be pixel only, might be google camera only (so that would apply to any phone where you can install this app) or it might even be a pixel feature but tons of OEMs have already duplicated it (that's not exactly a recent feature so I would not be surprised)
I'm less interested in the productivity side of things, but this looks great for entertainment. I don't like reading ebooks on a phone-sized screen, which wouldn't be an issue. This could also be pretty neat for light gaming with Steam Link/Xbox Gamepass/Moonlight. I'm currently in a situation where I'm able to work remotely for a while, but I'm not going to bring my desktop with me if I spend a week at a cabin in the wilderness.
At this price it's not quite worth it for me, but hopefully the Surface Duo does well and dual screen devices get a bit cheaper and add in features I care about like wireless charging
As a phone, it stands out. The giant screen that fits in your pocket is a neat gimmick. It stakes out some potentially influential space on the ground between "phone" and "computer", where market expectations haven't been fully established yet. It costs around as much as other elite phones. "Surface Phone" could have been a great shot into the cutting edge phone market.
As a Surface, it's on a different OS and won't run the same software. It gives up peripherals, ports, and screen real estate. Adding a keyboard would make the Duo less practical as a mobile computer than a Surface with the tidy keyboard option. It costs as much as far more powerful Surfaces, but at least it fits in your pocket?
They seem to think people use the phone has a handset without headphones/speaker, which is a bit strange.
Setting aside the fact that Android tablet software is still a bit of a mess, are people going to want to watch movies and play games on a tablet with a big crack in the middle? Even surfing the web, you can't really view a page well in landscape. Likewise spreadsheets, word processing, etc
Apps like email which do well with multiple panes would be great, but only if they can mind the gap.
So much of what I use the iPad for is full screen, I'm a bit skeptical about how well those things translate to 2 half screens.
"Two apps at once" is good, but the winner to me is master-detail support in all apps when it makes sense, without fussing around with child/popup windows, tabs or dividers -- this is a huge productivity gain, IMHO. (E.g., email list in bottom, selected email on top, etc.)
Assuming all the apps in question support this view. I'm sure Microsoft's tools will. Not sure about how many others.
> this is a huge productivity gain, IMHO.
Versus what? On an iPad/ tablet, you can have splits where it makes sense int he interface. On this, you are stuck with the hardware split. Obviously it's way better than a phone if that's your compare. So if your job can be done on a phone, this is maybe the boss.
Then again, I am not its target demographic. MS Surface line never entered my consideration.
Even Windows 10X now looks like it won't be coming as expected.
Given how the whole Android ecosystem works, in terms of updates and Java support, is not as I would like, but I guess one needs to take such things how they are and not how they could be.
So "Courier" could have been Windows, but it ended up being Android based.
iPhone - Yes, and was only available on At&t for the initial 5 yrs
Is this Microsoft's first Android device?
I find that very interesting and even significant. The Microsoft of 10 years ago would never in a million years use someone else's OS. I see it as a good thing.
I'm not sure if Microsoft strategy to call it a new device category instead of tablet is effective though. I can imagine if Apple was doing it, they would just call it a fold-able/dual-screen tablet.
Maybe some day MS will make the Surface Duo run Android apps on a full OS, or make enough changes to Android to make it a usable as a primary not consumption-oriented device.
Also weirdly reminds me of the Sony Vaio P for some reason.
Price is definitely steep. They clearly know their market.
No need for a fragile and hard to hold hinge.
Just a phone with a screen the size of one side of that Duo, offering the biggest single pane that will fit easily in the back pocket of a pair of jeans.
Please.
Perhaps you're naive to the Surface design team's experience with hinges but judging from that pedigree it's extremely unlikely they haven't engineered the heck out of it.
Or if it's like Android apps on my Chromebook where only a single active app actually runs, while all other apps get suspended in the background, even if they're visible.
The latter would make this concept pretty useless so I hope they actually solved this and are planning on upstreaming the changes so all future devices can benefit.
I'd love to know the chain of thought to this thing being created--what problems was it supposed to solve, and for what kind of customer?
I watched the ad for it, and the thing that stood out to me was I think the "cast" was entirely female. I wonder if that was intentional?
Is there any reason this would be marketed at women specifically?
I'm not sure though, the commercial is a sort of story about a group of women planning to go on a trip. That's entirely reasonable, I don't see what gender has to do with the product. It's not like they sell a pink and a blue one for girls and boys or anything.
Was the all-female cast intentional or just incidental to the team that worked on the ad?
I think it's perfectly fine either way, but I was curious.
The hardware looks nice but I'm rather let down to see it's just running Android.
Can't imagine this will be popular at all.
A phone OS, then why not use a phone? Oh, bigger screen? Use a tablet. With huge phones nowadays this just doesn't serve a market.
it's a glorified nintendo DS for 1399. Embarassing.
You do realize a world existed before Apple made the iPod and the iPhone right?
Microsoft should focus on actual innovation. We've reached stagnation in SV - it's all an adtech scam now. A bifold phone with no new technology. Just tape it together and call it "innovation."
Apple is in a rut too, but Apple has released more interesting hardware than microsoft has in ages. New Xbox - glorified gaming PC with no unique titles at Launch. Halo Infinite had graphics from 2014. Windows 10 spies on you, has a terrible dual infrastructure OS with newschool apps and old school control panel.
Oh and I'm supposed to think Teams which really just stole ideas from everyone else is innovative.