“What color is the Sun?” An example of science education pathology (2012)
clarifyscience.info
clarifyscience.info
Without any proof, I will offer a guess: Because it is the wrong question!
If you ask "What is the wavelengths of the light than the sun emits?", you are setting an expectation of an accurate answer. "What color is the sun?" seems a casual question that expects a casual answer.
> White is unambiguously the correct answer.
Obviously false without knowing at what relative speed and in which direction the Sun moves relative to the observer. There are always different degrees of accuracy and expectations need to be set to get the correct answer.
That accounts for any relativistic and atmospheric issues.
This refers to perceptually matching the color of an ideal black body glowing at the specified temperature.
The documented color temperatures of different lights vary considerably. Rarely do they match sunlight. Daytime, overhead sunlight at the Earth's surface has a bluer spectrum than most lightbulbs, but sunlight doesn't look bluish-white because color perception adjusts rapidly for ambient light, and sunlight is so bright it dominates even when it's seen indoors through a window.
If that were true, how would we ever see blue things?
You seem to be making the mistake I specifically warned against of defining color by the distribution of wavelengths coming from the object. Once again, the definition of color is ambiguous, and most people will use the human perception definition. Purple things don't have to be composed of pure violet light.
And no, I don't understand your point. I don't see what it has to do with yellow-red light.
If the Sun would only emit one wavelength, you'd need an artificial light source to get white (R+G+B) light.
The answer white is correct in regards of the visible light spectrum. But you need to add infrared and UV to it.
Red and blue shift is relevant for objects that move relatively to us observers. E.g. other stars within our galaxy, or galaxy relative to other galaxies.
Since we orbit the sun relatively slowly you won't notice significant red or blue shift here.
— What color is the sun?
— White. (pauses...) But some people color it yellow.
— Why is that?
— I don't know, because it's a bright color. (shrugs and runs off to play)
It dawned on my that when drawing on a white piece of paper, it's not exactly easy to draw a white object without resorting to inverse video (coloring the blue sky in such a way as to leave a spot that represents the sun).
> * it emits most of its energy around 500 nm, which is close to blue-green light. So one might say that the sun is blue-green! *
Fantastic!
So human eye is more sensitive to the same wavelengths the Sun emits more! So it all evens out and the Sun only appears white! That's why we define white as white as this is "lit by the Sun / reflects all sunlight" - our only source of light for many years. So if e.g. dog's eye is sensitive to different wavelengths it should see the Sun in different color? But then again, a dog should call it "white" as this is what you would call "lit by sun" as opposed as e.g. "lit by fire".
Fascinating!
It has way more to do with the biology and psychology of how we perceive and interpret color (which is an incredibly in-depth and complicated subject!)
Overall the post gives off huge crank vibes, and browsing around the rest of their site does nothing to disabuse me of this impression.
If you answer “white” then the next question is “why does it look yellow”. This article seems to presuppose that there is a “correct” way to answer a five-year-old that will prevent further questions.
As odd, as it may seem, the presence of the object stole the attention away from the subject. Only later, learning about wave refraction/reflection on the media border has finally elucidated, so to speak, the priciple and placed the origin to the property of the sunlight.
It could've been summarized as "I believe in Prizm" :)
Then you say it doesn't look yellow at all, outside of sunsets.
You just think it does because that's what you have been taught to crayon at school. In the normal sky it's white.
In Japan they get taught to color it red, so kids there think the sun is always red.
Seems like a name change is in order.
Therefore the sun looks "neutral" to us. Which is "white".
Or at least sunlight does. The sun itself looks like "pain" :)
This is a Carnap-level kind of interpretation, but it's so very important if we're going to be scientific to be understanding of the limitations of our builtin sensors and the resulting limitations of our modelling.
What color are x-rays?
Hmm, isn't sun wavelength actually closer to very very bright green?
It makes the most sense to call that white. Although, the wavelength of peak intensity is a green.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_irradiance#/media/File:S...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_vision#/media/File:Cone-...
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Solar_spectrum_en.sv...
Whoever says the color of the Sun is always white has no idea what they are talking about.
Even the lumen is calibrated to the receptivity of the human eye over various wavelengths.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity_function
I think a much better example of this idea is shown in one of my favorite 80s videos, "A Private Universe" which asks Stanford alumni (in their robes no less) why the moon has phases. Then they show how their misconceptions go all the way back to primary school and were never challenged.
Look at photo's on the internet, it's clearly white.
Being clever about scattering blue is wrong. If it did change the color of the sun to yellow during the day, the clouds would be yellow around it like sunset clouds.
The only 'clever' answer why it's not white might be, that small part of the day when people see it without pain, it is yellow.
If you had never seen a sunset or sunrise or a NASA false color sun image or a crayon drawing as a kid, you'd be adamant it is white.
This is what the article is about, people here while trying to be smart still don't seem to get it is actually white most of they day. There is no trick, no optical illusion, it's just a simple question about a thing we are told not to look at.
http://solar-center.stanford.edu/SID/activities/GreenSun.htm...
Similarly the correct answer to "Why is the sky blue?" is: "It isn't - small particles reflect ultraviolet even better than blue. We just can't (consciously) see those colors."
ipRGCs do detect UV, and our brains do get this message, and we can report it under at least some conditions.
Cliff Stoll gives a great anecdote about this. He's asked "Why is the sky blue", and to every answer he gives the interviewer asks "Why?" Turns out it's a bit complicated.
> "Why is the sky blue?" is: "It isn't - small particles reflect ultraviolet even better than blue. We just can't (consciously) see those colors."
Aren't "colors" defined as the sensations our eyes give us depending on the wavelengths entering them ? Hence "ultraviolet" isn't a color, since our eyes can't detect them.
There is "light" and "visible light" but afaik there is no such thing as "colors" and "visible colors", as "colors" = how our brain interpret visible light.
Somebody asks what colour is the sun, the follow up should be why? Are they going to draw the sun on a piece of paper? Then expect a traditional red sun. Or yellow. Nobody draws the the sun as white.
Note that the sun is red, at dusk.
Any time you can actually look at it, otherwise, it is very distinctly yellow. When you can't look at it, it doesn't have a color, because duh.
Color is hard because of broad spectrum sources, atmospheric scattering effects, biology effects (2-4 wavelength receptors in human eyes), and human psychology ("auto white-balance"). This leads to ambiguous language.
The article does nothing to shed light on those issues.
OMFG. It most certainly is not. "White" is a very good explanation for the sum of all visible light that reaches the environment on the ground.
But if you look at (or really towards) the actual bright thing in the sky, you see it as yellow. Preschool kids and amateurs aren't wrong on this. It's yellow. Go look.
I mean, even that's not correct. The disk of the sun itself is too bright for your retina to actually sense, saturates the cells, and leaves weird artifacts (and no small amount of permanent damage, of course) that look like all sorts of colors.
But the glare around the sun that you see before you look away is, for sure, yellow. The shorter wavelengths have been preferentially scattered away on the direct path to your eye. They are the "blue" that someone else sees when they look to that path in the "sky". What's left... is yellow (relative to the general color balance of the non-direct light, that is).
Sure sure, "solar irradiance" is as good a definition for "white" as you'll find. But "the sun" is yellow.
Under « Methods - Question design » in the article:
« The "ball" helps clarify intent - 'object, viewed from space', not 'eyeball observation made through atmosphere'. »
So... I don't get it. Your point is that the article's interpretation is "right" because they purposefully designed the question to be confusing? Would you react the same way if you were reading an opinion poll that played the same trickery?
I mean, if they wanted a "correct" answer, why didn't they just ask "what color is sunlight?"