Hacker News Reader

There's no point in testing, retesting if the test isn't precise. Are there any reliable tests available? Statistics points that tests aren't reliable.

Excess deaths aren't reliable either, because it can happen independent of any new disease.

The fact that strikes me most is that people have the same flu symptoms, but no "new" symptoms different from the diseases we already know.

View on HN

Generally speaking ... If the false positive rate is low enough and the costs of performing the test aren’t prohibitive... running the test multiple times makes sense regardless of how precise or sensitive it is.

an example with math... if false negative is 75%, but false positive is 0%, then you just run the test multiple times to increase confidence in the results.

But if the results are wrong or misleading, there’s no point in trusting in them.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com