Around 78% of browsers hitting the site are running IE8, and these will be parents making use of the portal to do stuff like check calendar dates, book appointments to see teachers, and check student grades.
We tried extremely hard to move the community onwards, including outreach to upgrade computers for families and so on. But in the end, they just don't want to move on from Windows XP because everything else is too confusing. Even if you make it look the same.
As for how often they're using the site... It's somewhere around 1/3rd of the parents hit it at least once a day using an outdated browser.
... Whilst their kids are using school-provided Thinkpads all running on Windows 10, or recent-ish school-provided iPads. (The school does all the maintenance on them as well).
Windows xp + IE + elicipse + office 2003 or 2007 I think.
If Google and Mozilla aren't going to step up their "managed browser" game then we're going to continue seeing MS and Apple dominate education. It's not like school IT depts like running IE, but it's basically the only browser you can lock down.
"But you shouldn't lock down kids' browsers, and let them have blah blah..."
Okay look, I don't actually give two shits if little Marcus wants to browse Pornhub on his school laptop, we're honestly not paid enough to care. But we do have administration breathing down our necks, school policies to enforce, and angry detached parents to appease.
It was the parents who refused to move beyond XP.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/products/firefox-enterpris...
Still hard for me to believe the figures though. 78%??? Wonder which country they live in.
I've seen things like that here in Mexico but not winxp, and not in 2020. And not to younger parents with kids who can use computers. Maybe they're in China or something where pirated winxp still apparently flourishes.
Most of the parents I dealt with treated technology like it might be infectious, and they didn't want to get sick. Most didn't even have email.
Think... The sort of people who print and mail pictures someone found on the internet, because they never touch email.
They don't actually want to visit any website.
The sites range from small mom & pop stores to restaurant chains with dozens of locations worldwide to large scale CRMs for larger corporations. We're all over the place. The sites we host, which often do not include our bigger clients, are doing about 30 million unique visitors each week across them currently. Not a massive amount of traffic by any means, but it's still upwards about 400k users we're dropping support for (in addition to about 500k on older versions we already dropped).
Note: all of my metrics are coming from server access logs. Nothing complex any no front end validation of the browser versions (I don't have access to client-side Analytics for each site)
Because it's an educational organization, we must assume that members are operating on outdated solutions behind weirdly restrictive firewalls. I don't bother to fully support Internet Explorer for all features, but I do need to make sure the critical path at least functions on a basic level, and I'm careful not to rely on any dependencies (analytics, etc) that I cannot self host.
Of course, it's the directors who insist on doing everything on their iPad that give me more trouble, as I don't actually own one to test. :)
Shouldn't they give you one for testing?
#zgrep -i trident access.log*.gz | wc -l
580
It's not a huge number of visits to be sure, but we're also a rather small organization and in our off season, so we're not receiving a whole ton of traffic to begin with.Gamers tend to be pretty technically inclined, so the audience mostly uses pretty modern browsers.
I support down to ES3 (Safari 5, IE9) mostly because I can (I learned web dev back in the old days and still remember all the tricks), although it's nice to see fans talk about playing on obscure platforms like the Nintendo 3DS browser or a Samsung smart refrigerator.
Animations are implemented in jQuery animations, and the networking is provided by SockJS (which can fall back to JSONP long-polling and even iframes if the browser doesn't support WebSocket).
However the apps developed for clients are for Chrome
The customer was happy for us to only cover "core functionality" and not visual and minor issues in IE 11.
Already removed some polyfills, biggest win will be transpiling just for modern browsers [1]. This all ties in nicely with general performance initiatives.
[0]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/197987
[1]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/36840
B2B side has been moving slowly off IE11, but moving faster since the start of the year and with most of the rest of the customers targeting to be off of it originally by end of quarter. Currently sitting around 40% but if they go through with their plans to upgrade by end of quarter then will be around 5%
B2C side is much lower, the users who visit not very frequently or are newer that use IE is low single digits. On the other hand we have some long term continuous use users who use IE at a higher rate than the B2B side
Interesting - like what?
I think one of the main drivers of IE support is clients who will test in IE because it's their default browser or only allowed browser at work.
Still too high of a % to ignore.