New York Times Quietly Scrubs Chinese Propaganda

How easy was it to distinguish the "advertorials" from legitimate articles?

This is how: it's paid for by the Chinese government:

> The new disclosure revealed that the Post and the Journal each received more than $100,000 per month to run print versions of Chinese propaganda articles. The Times received $50,000 in 2018 to place the propaganda on its website, presumably a small fraction of the revenue it made selling print space to China Daily.

Though $50k is rather small potatoes for a giant like NYT.

No, rbecker is asking more - If I walked up to a news stand, bought the NYT and turned to page 7, how would i know that content is an advertorial instead of a NYT article.

Edit: Answer - there's a blue bar at the top saying "Advertisement" https://twitter.com/saurabhvashist_/status/12425270068159324...

Trivially easy. I haven't seen these, or the Russia Today sections in the papers lately, but you couldn't mistake them from the paper's own reporting.

The Daily Telegraph in the UK was earning £750k/year for publishing CCP content for many years and has also only just stopped.

I would love to see these articles, now that I know where they come from.

Can anyone scan them and put them online?

Anti-Chinese propaganda is welcome.