I mean, it's not going to win any philosophical debates, but these kinds of results are WORLDS better than they would have been just a couple of years ago. I have to wonder what would it take to impress you.

Shrug I thought it was wonderful and hilarious. I think people who aren't impressed are probably in denial.

Could you elaborate on why you aren't impressed? This particular example doesn't suffer from either of the main GPT-3 "tells" I've noticed up to this point (weak backbone and nonsensical assertions).

If I had to guess, I would say this essay was written by a human pretending to be GPT-3. Do you agree (except with higher confidence) and that's why you aren't impressed?