Government issued ID's are not mandatory nor is seatbelt use on any private property.
For what it’s worth, I think a mask order is reasonable.
Also, think of a man as underwear for your face. You can strut around your house naked all you want, but you can't walk down the street that way, and I'm fairly certain the grocery store can't unilaterally decide to be a nudist friendly operation either. If the Venn diagram of places where you can be legally naked and places you can not wear a mask were basically the same, the original commenter' version of "everywhere" would be sufficiently met.
Perhaps not in the US, but it's mandated in pretty much across all western society.
And the US's refusal to adopt a standard ID system also leads to pseudo-ID schemes and proxies such as social security numbers and driver's license.
> nor is seatbelt use on any private property.
That's a great example.because no one is requiring anyone to wear facemasks while they are in their own home. The key take should be that the goal of these measures is to mitigate the risk that a specific threat poses to the public. You are required to wear a seatbelt while driving in public roads because the risk of being involved in a traffic accident is relatively high. You are required to wear a face mask in public because the risk of transmitting the virus is relatively high. Once you cease to be in public then the risk you pose to others is negligible.
We do have a standardized ID system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_ID_Act
The ironic thing is that despite this widespread attitude, we have genuinely scary levels of mass surveillance.