I'm honestly at a loss. Is this some galaxy brain "let's make the web experience terrible to force people to native apps" strategy?
I'm honestly at a loss. Is this some galaxy brain "let's make the web experience terrible to force people to native apps" strategy?
Is this some galaxy brain "let's make the web experience terrible to force people to native apps" strategy?
Yes. If you browse it on your phone they even make more annoying by displaying footbar "launch on our native app"The good thing is that refusing to download the app has cleared me of my reddit addiction
I also found that the mobile dials home quite regularly when in background.
Everything they’ve done after maybe 2010 could just be thrown away.
An enormous waste of programmer effort and time for something that is a lot worse than what they started with.
You've just described a whole lot of programming work.
Throw in the second-system effect they fell for in my humble opinion, and you got your explanation of what's going on.
Next up: Rinse and repeat.
10 years isn't necessarily bad either. Just look at HN. Functional with minimum of JS, 2.0kB transferred to load this reply page, tho it will not win any fancy design awards anytime soon. But all in all, great user experience. If you wanted to inline the reply form into the comments pages, that can be done easily in under 1KB of unminified js.
Loading the reddit frontpage (not signed in, adblocker): 21.8MB transferred (11.7 without media and fonts), 501 requests (183), 20+ seconds to load, 11667 ms of scripting. What the actual fuck.
old.reddit.com: 2.7MB transferred (2.1MB), 100 requests (24), <2seconds to load, <300ms of scripting.
Honestly I'm pretty sure this could be said for the entirety of the web and we'd be better off.
It is exactly that. Apps are proprietary, so they can be closed, filled with ads or spyware (name one app that doesn't ask for access rights to everything), and branded. Even the groceries store down the street would likely force you to use their own crappy app - so you would have their logo on your home screen - rather than a generic browser that won't tell anyone you buy from them.
I think they are well aware that a lot of older users (some likely heavy _content_contributors_) will simple walk away if they do this.
You can't sell ads if you don't have original content that drives traffic to your pages.... old.reddit.com as well as '.compact' are the price to pay to prevent a digg type exodus.
It sucks because I love reddit, but it will be EOL for the people who made it what it is in about 3-5 years
One of the more insulting parts of their UX.
I bet forcefully unsetting it bumps their usage metrics for the new site though.
Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/old-reddit-redirec...
Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/old-reddit-re...
I often browse Reddit with Safari and there haven't been very many extensions available for it. Certainly none to do something simple like this, since it would have to be made available through the app store.
PS: Apple has announced that FireFox and Chrome extensions can be made available for Safari in Big Sur, although it seems like they have to go through a convoluted process and probably pay $99/year for the privilege.
RedReader and Slide come to mind.
Edit: that was on Android, I guess there are alternatives for iOS too, even if less likely to be open source.
Definitely have a feeling its days are numbered, they'll eventually start disabling bits of their API.