A plunge in incoming sunlight may have triggered 'Snowball Earths'
phys.org
phys.org
https://impacts.to/preview.html
If you'd rather read it as a PDF instead of images:
Winter monsoons became stronger during geomagnetic reversal https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/07/190703121407.h...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary
The negative gain from weathering and volcanism is also quite well-known.
The authors of this paper put 2 and 2 together and showed that you only need a brief period of reduced insolation to trigger a snowball earth, and that once insolation returns to normal it can stay in the snowball state for much longer.
Would be fun to learn the mathematics, physics, and macrobiology to solve this!
Hold a finger up in front of a torch, and look at the size of the shadow cast. Move the finger closer to the torch, and watch the shadow area increase.
A shadow is always larger than the light-facing area of the object blocking the light. This is true even of your own shadow in sunlight, even though your distance from the light source means the change is so tiny you don't even notice it.
------
------ S
------ S
------ A S
E A S
------ A S
------ S
------ S
------
*drawing not to scaleFor Earth, in solar orbit, that means you'd have to get inside the orbit of Venus.
Then you have a huge energy cost in keeping your shading object in the correct position relative to Earth. Its natural orbit is not going to work at all.
Sol has a diameter of ~100 times the Earth. A shade near Earth would have to be similar size to Earth to block most of the light, and likewise similar size to Sol if it was near Sol.
The leap between its claim, and yours, is massive, and would require incredibly extraordinary evidence.