Removing the burden of health care from companies would maybe solve a bunch of these problems and allow companies to risk hiring older people.
Removing the burden of health care from companies would maybe solve a bunch of these problems and allow companies to risk hiring older people.
These kinds of things seem like there is no way to enforce them.
I don't even know if that's a thing, health insurance being more expensive for companies with older employees or whatever, but just in general. "You can't fail to hire such and such type of person because it's illegal," doesn't seem to actually have much practical ability to influence a hiring process if it wants strongly enough to not be influenced.
I haven't done any research on this and could be completely off base. Just have the same thought when I see this mentioned in general and started typing this time.
I could be wrong also, not an expert by any means, but that is basically what our HR rep told me when I inquired (not because of age but because my wife is high-risk/high-cost, depending how you look at it). I was told that was not part of the equation because of how it was setup. It could if it was a small enough business that tried to negotiate something themselves, maybe?