> Can you comment on what measures have brought down the infection numbers?
Working from home, banning large gatherings, remote education for universities and secondary schools, reminders to keep the distance, table service only at restaurants and more space between tables.
> the infection numbers?
Sweden, like pretty much every other country, has no idea how large the number of unknown infections were back in March and April. The only certain numbers we have are ICU patients and deaths, and those have been declining constantly since mid-April. Presumably, actual cases follow the same curve.
> Why were they so high in the beginning
Exponential growth before any measures were taken.
> why are they falling so quickly now?
They're not falling quickly now, deaths and ICU patients have been falling linearly since mid-April. Death curve here: https://adamaltmejd.se/covid/
As to why, my best guess is that this virus simply wasn't much different from any other flu virus. A bit more deadly, but whatever measures people in Sweden took was enough to curb it. Also, herd immunity is probably much easier to achieve than earlier models suggest.
Also, note that the death curves for Sweden and the UK are pretty much identical despite wildly different amount of restrictions implemented: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-covid-deaths-per-mi...
> After implementing measures it can take a few weeks to show results
Yes, and actual analysis of mobility shows that people voluntarily took a lot of measures before actual recommendations were put into place. Same as everywhere else. Most EU countries implemented their lockdowns weeks after the peak.
> Also speaking of measures, to my knowledge, the government did not take hard measures but rather suggested a lot of the same things that other countries put into law and the Swedish population is very compliant.
Yes. That said, mobility dropped less in Sweden compared to neighbour countries who had stronger recommendations and rules in place. You can compare the mobility curves between countries at the bottom of this page: https://covid19.healthdata.org/sweden
> I'm not IN Sweden, so I only have the media image.
I'm sorry, the media image is absolutely bananas. I have never seen such blatant bias to skew everything to make Sweden look like a zombie apocalypse to drum up support for lockdowns. But it looks like lockdowns are much less effective than people think. And it looks like a small amount of meaningful measures pushed the effects of this down to less than a regular flu season.
Unmitigated, it would have been worse, but it's been mitigated everywhere, and here we are.