Most of their workload is bullshit. People with colds and sore throats, depressing people using ER as primary care, assholes using 911 to score Medicaid cab vouchers.
And at any time, any number of people can show up with any kind of personal tragedies from stokes to various traumas. My sister quit after a 13 year old bled out from a gsw, and she walked out of the room and got kicked in the head by an prisoner who had been stabbed after he bit the ears off of three other prisoners, and broke the arm of a guard.
Bite a 2nd inmate's ear...shame on him.
Bite a 3rd inmate's ear...that's fricking badass.
That said, I would also wager that the curve can be skewed towards one side or the other depending on the location, timing of your shift, or any other factors.
Let’s say a content moderator got paid $200k per year, that doesn’t change the images they see. This isn’t about money as much as it’s about the requirements and preparation required for the job.
Oh I'm sure FB could think of a few ways.
A decent compensation structure might be a good place to start.
I still maintain expecting companies to do this on their own is a category error.
Companies think moderation is a cost center. Even if the moderators do the best possible job, they aren't adding value, only removing liabilities. The company is the wrong entity we should be asking for solutions to this problem. They are going to minimize costs and shift liabilities to 3rd parties (which will in turn hire independent contractors and play shell games in case they are sued).
We have to demand adversarial outside actors (government, labor unions, lawyers, non-profits, mental health professionals, etc) to start shaping the direction of the solution.
The root of the problem, which is rarely mentioned in these discussions, is that many people enjoying comfortable living conditions believe themselves to be “pure-blooded” and unable to deal with “unclean” things because of the possible “traumas”. (What is an ideal person free of “traumas”, anyway? A vegetable stoned on drugs?) You can easily see here the resemblance of a old time countess complaining about her “nerves” while her serfs do all the dirty work. Is there a natural law that says a poor grunt is bound to clean the junk from what you see on the website? Do it yourself.
The same happens with medical, law enforcement, and other professions. They are considered “special” jobs for “special” people (which is not true, the one who defines it like that is “special”). Then, any worries and doubts are neutralized by convenient “but it's their profession, they chose it, they are paid for it, etc.” This creates a stupid rift between “us” and “them”, and affects how both sides reason about themselves.
The resulting imbalance is routinely abused. Social networks are competing in presenting a rose-colored walled fantasy to their human cattle to increase yield — everyone can see they use “The Matrix” as a business plan. This creates a lot of shitty jobs where people waste their emotional capacity to make others pleased, not unlike in prostitution. On the other hand, media is hooking the softened consumer with the sensationalist outrage bait about maniacs, wars, corruption, presumed orgies, etc. To makes things worse, the limits to all of that are set not by some moral standards or concern about someone's well-being, as it is often implied, but by advertisement contracts. The bureaucratic machine decides what is “suitable” for the visitors. For example, this makes most of the talk around “Free The Nipple” moot: there is no undercover agents of patriarchy to battle, it's advertisers who bring money and judge what is unwanted “sexual content” (some might say it's a perfect example of capitalist oppression — cue “L'Internationale”).
Even this discussion is full of overreacting people. No, the video on your screen is not as “horrible, horrible” as experiencing something firsthand, nor the pain of the tortured can be compared to the pain of the random witnesses on the internet (if we don't count their own wild fantasies). If it happens, then it's no good to pretend it's not. Who knows, it may even make you think. All in all, humans don't show a lot of originality in what they produce, so the number of things you can expect to see is quite limited. I can only conclude by reiterating that knowledge is power, ignorance is bliss, and there's a lot of people who'd like to benefit from others' ignorance in many ways.
(Note how much the "thin blue line" imagery is used in conjunction with this - that's how you know who's the target audience.)
It all ultimately comes from Dave Grossman, who's one of the most worshipped figures in modern American policing: https://www.policeone.com/police-products/training-products/...
This guy now runs the "Grossman Academy", which offers police training. It's popular enough that they have train-your-entire-PD discounts.