I'd say another difference is the percentage of your attention is being devoted to this kind of thing. Presumably reddit or phpbb mods aren't spending 40 hr/wk looking at gore.
Wouldn't that suggest then that the "ideal" way to do it is a very part time job then with high volume? Like say 5 hours a week. It would be a scheduling and logistical nightmare of course but it would give more "dispersion time" for trauma.
I'd be interested to see if the tooling around moderation could also be improved. For example, could the images start heavily blurred, with a circle of clarity that opens when you click. Or something like that, which would harm throughput, but be more humane.
This is a very interesting idea. It could reveal only a portion and see how often that was enough for the moderator to pass judgement.
tbh I've been a moderator on various old school forums for over a decade, and I've never had to deal with anyone posting any gore at all. I think they're usually too tight knit and reputation based for anyone to feel like they could get away with it. it's not like people posting gore on facebook are doing it to mess with the moderators, that's just a side effect