Or make it a CV-22, the Air Force variant. These things have already been used in search and rescue missions.
It's ok though because anyone that has flow commercially has indirectly funded a military. It's nonsense.
I doubt the amount of money even matters to them. It's most likely linked to retaining their trademark or something similar.
Finally, the V-22 isn't an attack craft. All experiments into the idea have been outright rejected and the only weapon it carries is a single browning machine gun which is optional (and could easily be mounted to basically anything). This is like protesting the creation of a truck model because technicals exist.
> The arms section of Boeing® also produces fighter jets, fighter helicopters, bombs and rockets (even intercontinental nuclear rockets). There are numerous examples of the use of Boeing® arms violating human rights, humanitarian and international law.
Otherwise they would also complain about LEGO Boeing 787 Dreamliner:
https://www.lego.com/en-my/service/buildinginstructions/1017...