English is not my main language, but "broke into" doesn't implicate "breaking" something to get "into" something?
And you wouldn't get much sympathy, but this is a legally viable complaint. When my car was stolen, the thief was charged for theft, but his girlfriend who was joyriding with him was charged for criminal trespass. Just being in the car when you don't have permission is illegal.
It isn't necessary to actually "break" anything.
Edit: Of course, it's still not a great metaphor because it implies there was at least some kind of barrier to entry that had to be pushed aside - but from the sounds of it, there wasn't.