The United Nations of Uniqlo
economist.com
economist.com
The clothes tend to be the right side of 'fashionable', ie the cuts are modern and flattering, the price is very comparable with and often better than the other UK high street rivals, and most importantly the quality for the most part far surpasses everything else in the price bracket. It's (generally) far better than buying from Zara or H&M, which feels very 'fast' in comparison.
The GAP comparison is probably apt, although one thing I really appreciate about Uniqlo (especially compared to GAP) is the lack of branding and logos. You can easily build a complete wardrobe (work/pub/play) - especially if you're buying base pieces. Which is probably the reason they get a lot of love on /r/malefashionadvice/.
If they had a similar free delivery option as Asos Premium, would probably use them for pretty much everything.
Though I don't fully understand their ridiculously long trousers.
Edit: as per responses, make use of their alterations service!
I don’t have any length issues with their pants due to my height but perhaps they are intended to be hemmed?
Too long can be fixed. Too short cannot.
I have a thin build and that translates to either baggy thighs or short leg lengths in many brands. Uniqlo long pants are great for me because they also offer alteration services[1] so I can always get a good fit.
[1] https://www.uniqlo.com/us/en/page/alteration-service.html
As others have pointed out, they hem them for free. This is a clever bit of optimization for them, for two reasons:
(1) Fewer SKUs to stock. Each type of pant only varies in waist, not length.
(2) The pants become non-returnable after alternation. This reduces the number of items that can be returned substantially, since very few people fit the dimension of the pants.
Each week they suggest "outfits" for you and you can buy them all, bits of them, or none of them (you can ignore the emails). They then send them to you, and you can try them on in your home, and sending them back is super-easy (put them in the box, drop at collect+). They pull from many different other shops and brands.
I promist I don't work for them, I just really love the service :) As someone who also hate clothes shopping it was a revelation.
Thanks. I just check it out and Really like the idea. Somehow those recommendation dont work for me. But at last it gave me a few useful tips to further look into.
I also am a fan of the lack of branding - the simplicity helps to complement other pieces, however I do also buy some of their UT Graphic Tees, especially since the designs are so... well, unique.
Still occasionally shop their for some niche items (longjohns spring to mind) but generally I find a store best avoided
So if you are picky about these sort of things Uniqlo tends to offer inconsistency.
In my country, Indonesia, I would guess the quality bar from Uniqlo would be pretty low since it's in SEA, but compared to local brands, I think the stuffs Uniqlo makes are really good, I loved shopping in Uniqlo.
I also have some Uniqlo underwear that changed code where the old ones fit well and the new ones didn't.
I'm still a happy customer, but it does mean that I have to be a little cautious about buying 5 more of something just because my previous experience with it was good.
This article talks about how they produce their fabric, but the thing they realised super early is how valuable _vertical integration_ can be in fashion retail. They own the end to end process, from raw material purchase upwards.
They can do this BECAUSE of how limited their selection is, if you're a fast fashion retailer you always needs new materials and new patterns and new tooling so it's incredibly hard to chase vertical integration and strong unit economics. They get savings by pushing that risk and RnD onto dedicated manufacturers in places like Bangladesh. It's 'just in time' manufacturing in a pretty extreme sense. Because Uniqlo have so much less cardinality in their stock they can focus and optimise for it. It also enables them to control quality in a way few others can.
Most fashion retailers work with contract factories. They design a garment (or line of garments) and then put out a tender to a set of factories in their approved supplier list. The factories then bid to manufacture those garments. The decision-making criteria for the fashion companies vary but are usually some combination of quality on offer, price and 'time to store'/turnaround time. This tender process can happen dozens or hundreds of times a year for big, high turnover fast fashion retailers. Some of these retailers do have their own factories, but most don't.
The reason these retailers need to do this is because they're always trying to stay 'on trend' and have the latest, most fashionable items at the lowest cost. They're 'chasing the zeitgeist'.
Uniqlo, on the other hand, doesn't chase fashion in the same way. They have a stable set of core garments they always sell in predictable (and VERY large) quantities. This means they can negotiate longer term, much larger scale deals with manufacturers that work out MUCH cheaper for them. It also means they can go 'up the value chain' and manufacture the fabrics and patterns and tooling themselves, reducing cost even further.
I'm surprised Uniqlo didn't take over the world in fashion. But EU/US buyers might not be careful enough to care about quality and just focus on how it looks like today.
Compared to those cheap brands, sure. I've mainly bought Uniqlo clothes for the last 4 years, and they've been decaying at about a slightly slower rate (maybe 0.75x) than similar brands to those you listed, but for each item, I estimate that it was probably 2-3x as expensive as their cheap counterpart.
In contrast to that, I also still wear some skateboard clothes that run in the same price range as Uniqlo and are ~10 years old by, which hold up much better (with most of the damage coming from my cat). I don't have any illusions that any of my Uniqlo stuff will last that long.
I still like Uniqlo, as they provide one of the most straightforward shopping experiences for someone who doesn't like shopping, but there is certainly room for improvement in their quality.
Maybe in the EU Uniqlo is expensive. But in Japan the prices were lower for what I'd pay for these brands.
For the US, here is t-shirts for Uniqlo vs H&M. Uniqlo is cheaper or at a similar price
> https://www.uniqlo.com/us/en/men/t-shirts
> https://www2.hm.com/en_us/men/products/t-shirts-tank-tops/gr...
Edit: Also if you haven't checked the cheaper brands in the last 4 years, you might not be aware that their quality deteriorated rapidly especially for Nike/Adidas.
The quality of these clothes, especially for this price range, is extraordinary. H&M - my previous go-to shop - is utter crap in comparison.
My Uniqlo pieces generally last at least 3 years with weekly wear. That's not bad at all. In the past decade, I've thrown out maybe 2 Uniqlo shirts due to fraying. Fast-fashion produces a lot of environmental waste, so quality matters.
They're the IKEA of clothing.
I have a few friends who work for Uniqlo on the e-commerce team in the US. They all tell me that the work culture is horrible. It’s very Japanese.
- Long unproductive hours gets your bosses appreciation.
- Very sexist and male dominated.
- They hate working remote even when it was absolutely necessary for the employee.
- No respect for maternity related issues.
Any company that would like to see itself become multinational has to adapt to local cultures
> As a child Yanai [Uniqlo's founder] was scared of his father, who would beat him for not finishing his breakfast quickly or spending too much time reading after bedtime. But a sense of duty lured him home after he graduated from university and he took over the family enterprise as its employees began to retire.
Doesn't get much more Japanese than this.
They mostly sounded like they had no choice but to do as they were told, and looked very exhausted when we met them in person.
...and that's coming from a reputable, well-off company. In Japan, they have a term called "black company"[1] that is essentially abusive sweatshops, but for office work. There's literally genres of manga that start off w/ the premise of people dying of overwork at these kinds of places.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_company_(Japanese_term)
Good luck on that. General consensus out here in Asia is that western people are lazy ( but not everyone feels this way! Some people consider westerners to be lazy and nice..)
Traditional Asian culture, this is my own Non controversial opinion coming, values hard work. A bunch of people I know who work in Science park in Taiwan are actually afraid of being productive because if they were to become more efficient then suddenly they would be working so much more. No managers reward productivity out here with a shorter work day.
If the rest of the world were to mandate four day work weeks by law, and flourish doing such, then the companies out here would rub their hands together greedily because they will dominate with their work culture and punishingly long hours.
So much about Japan is best in the world but their work culture is soul crushing.
'Dominating' doesn't seem like the appropriate word to apply to Japan right now? From Wikipedia:
Japan's asset price bubble collapse in 1991 led to a period of economic stagnation known as the "lost decade", sometimes now extended as the "lost 20 years." From 1995 to 2007, GDP fell from $5.33 trillion to $4.36 trillion in nominal terms. Japan today has the highest ratio of public debt to GDP of any developed nation, with national debt at 236% relative to GDP as of 2017. This debt is predominantly owned by Japanese nationals. The Japanese economy faces considerable challenges posed by an ageing and declining population, which peaked at 128 million in 2010 and has fallen to 126.5 million as of 2018. Projections suggest the population will continue to fall to potentially lower than 100 million by the middle of the 21st century.
Economies are complex. It's not clear that punishingly long hours at work are an advantage.
Honestly, it’s a cultural divide which probably won’t go away.
I know someone who works at a German owned branch for a manufacturer in Taiwan. The previous Taiwanese head guy got let go because for years they would be very behind schedule for deliveries. Like months behind.
So new big boss is a German. He gave a big talk to introduce himself to the factory. One of his main points was to reward productivity, KPI shouldn’t be the only metric, whatever. He recommended a book called The Lazy Project Manager and emphasized that this is the mindset he wants everyone to be in.
Funny thing is, the Taiwanese engineers kind of zoned out on everything he said but perked up at the word “lazy” in the book title. To cut to the chase, the factory thinks the new boss is lazy.
The hard working mentality is very deeply ingrained out here.
Regarding long hours, some Chinese co's use the 996 system, 9am-9pm, 6 days a week. This is one of the many reasons for their 7% increase in GDP YoY.
The 4 day work week in the West would simply cement the current idea of Western laziness (not necessarily unwarranted unfortunately).
But things are slowly changing though. Those that are younger generation ( Comparatively Speaking ) are in middle to higher management roles are more open and less hostile, so you start seeing a few Japanese companies picking up actual productivity increase and competing.
There is also "reverse racism" prevalent. i.e. if you are Korean (or Kor-Am) and are working for a Korean corporation, you might be judged on different standards than a coworker who is not Korean, or not East Asian. You're expected to work harder and more "passionately" for no extra compensation just because some vague notion of nationalistic/ethnistic Korean Pride.
I've interviewed at some of the big Japanese conglomerates too, and I got exactly the same feeling as I did with Korean companies.
I've come to the conclusion that I will never work for an East Asian company again barring some earth shattering changes to their corporate culture. Many of my ex-colleagues say the same.
I don't know what the right answer is, but I've worked in Asia as part of a multinational company and always felt weird about requiring pictures for job applications. There were also comments regarding female candidates that would definitely be considered unacceptable in the US but is normal there.
Once you put on the HeatTech extra warm leggings, you’ll understand why superheroes wear tights—they’re the bomb.
They seem to be going through a wierd cut phase, which accentuates men's chest in an awkward way and looks like dad wear unless you are really slim/athletic, but I hope it is temporary thing. (or maybe I just need to get in better shape)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%932020_Japan%E2%80%...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liancourt_Rocks_dispute
[3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_boycott_of_Japanese_produ...
I'm not sure what your point is. We should accept atrocities because everyone is doing it?
I'm surprised people here love uniqlo so much. They use Uygher slave labor.
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_internation...
http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4...
https://thediplomat.com/2020/07/japanese-firms-exit-south-ko...
Huh, that's surprising -- the stores I've been to are always pretty packed.
The whole "invisibility" thing throughout the article rings true for me -- I like Uniqlo (it's more or less the only place I shop for clothes now) because the quality is usually good, especially for the price, and most of the designs are nice and plain. The last thing I want my clothes to do for me is make me stand out.
The clothes are also durable and have good, timeless style.
Their winter undershirts are also great, super thin & breathable but plenty warm.
Something that has always fascinated me, though, is the irony of Japan being one of the leaders in street and urban fashion.
Uniqlo does a good business selling decent quality clothes at a decent price that are modern classics.
I just read somewhere that their plan from 2017-2020 is to increase the number of stores in Europe from 50 to 100.
For comparison H&M has 100 stores in Belgium alone.
And this is why I shop at Uniqlo, not at H&M or Zara. I like to ensure that my favourite basics will always be available for repurchase 2+ years after the original purchase, so I can replace a worn item.
I was looking for some specific bike parts and found the exact serial numbers for exactly what I need and there's no way to determine if anything similar still exists.
That being said, I wish semantic web blew up like it was supposed to. If we had ontologies for describing products that could be searched to find an appropriate item, that would be huge. But the scale was always limited by the nonzero rate of human error and the high rate at which humans lose interest in maintaining systems manually.
Uniqlo actually does this too, just in a rather different way. The company tends to make annual revisions to various products, sometimes changing minor things like cutting the shoulders more closely (which may even be mentioned, changelog-style on Uniqlo.com) to completely restyling the garment.
As an example of the latter, I had been thinking about getting one of their mountain parkas last year but decided to wait. The 2020 revision looks very different – fortunately in a way I still liked – but if I’d had my heart set on the 2019 version (or I had an older version that I needed to replace), I’d have been out of luck.
They have very few fabrications that are shared across many styles so they can order an entire mill's supply for a season in some cases. In this industry segment, materials costs can be ~70% of total production cost so this make an enormous impact.
They outsource to factories outside of Japan, but they will send in their own operations team to do production line setup and training. Their tolerances were very tight and QC process rigorous. If you walk into a factory, you will see Uniqlo branded posters up everywhere with "10 rules of quality control" and the like.
My former employer really prized hiring the same factories that Uniqlo used because we knew the QC was going to be a step above and the unit costs optimized.
Minimalist design, good fitting, decent materials, at a very affordable price point.
And I'm also continually impressed by their work on new materials: heat tech, tight "Chino" pants that are stretchy that I can do parkour in.
I really love their comfort sport coats. Great alternative to a sweater that can be dressed down to wear with denim. Mine always get compliments.