Hands-on: The $300 Kano PC, a “build-it-yourself” Chromebook competitor
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
The Kano teams response at the time was was: 'The design of Kano world sort of mimics Twitter, which means that shares are open to comment by the Kano World community. ... comment deleting is disabled on it is because there have been cases where a lot of users were excluded and bullied by having their comments deleted' I think this is an unsatisfactory unsophisticated response for a product aimed at children
Perhaps this is now improved?
Kano redesigned their online features several times, and my kids lost all their work and lost interest. But not until they had completed the learn to use the terminal adventure, which led to us playing zork.
I would think their design mimicking Twitter would put them under COPPA.
This content is a key part of their product, the whole point of the Kano is that it is a carefully prepared experience from the moment you hold the box, until you're writing bash scripts.
The interface would prompt you to post your work, and the way that choice was integrated, even if it wasn't mandatory, it seemed as if was the only way to save your work.
Once it was posted it was publicly available, and anyone with a Kano login could comment. If my daughter was logged in using the Kano she would be notified of the message. There did not seem to be any way to set any privacy controls, given that I asked Kano specifically about this I'm sure they would have let me know.
I confess I have a low tolerance for hype, and as a result my communication with the Kano team was a little bumpy. I was genuinely disappointed with aspects of their product. I think a more thoughtful self critical culture would have addressed what I believe were glaring problems. Overall I appreciate what they do and I bought three.
Windows isn't perfect, but it has the broadest ecosystem of applications in the world, and is far more manipulable than Chrome or iOS. Far more.
With that said, I hope that future tinkerers find a way to get their hands on Windows or Mac computers at home or in computer literacy labs.
Chromebooks are cheap to buy and maintain, that's why they are in classrooms.
Whatever the $OS, we don't #teach# privacy. In fact, privacy and critical thinking are the subjects that we teach #worse# than math.
Although Chromebooks are GOOGware, you can make them better by switching to dev mode and installing SeaBIOS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaBIOS). I boot Debian Linux on a CB with premium hardware. Cheapest "ultrabook" that you get, and with Firefox DoH and ESNI, you bleed less into the surveillance system.
It sounds like you received a version that was manufactured by a bad supplier, one we've moved away from.
Let me know if we can offer you something new and fresh to make up for the fumble here. Happy to give you anything from our current line. You will be impressed and overjoyed.
Alex Klein, Cofounder & CEO, Kano
I was a backer of that and the hardware and instruction book you received was great. I played with it for a bit, but I ended up gifting it to a friend who had two young kids. His daughter ended up using it to create same games in Scratch.
Interesting to see that they've moved onto Windows instead now. I wonder if it's so parents are more familiar and able to help with projects on it?
[1] https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/alexklein/kano-a-comput...
That is a possible reason, but the Kano PC kit also seems to be sold from the Microsoft store directly. So it is not unlikely that they made an agreement to sell with windows 10.
It probably is important for MS that Windows has some degree of penetration in this 'edutainment' sector (early user adoption etc.).
However, the extremely thin typecover doesn't feel that out of place on the surface, but it looks kind of strange attached to this very chunky Kano computer.
Here's us talking about the product and the Microsoft partnership on TV: https://www.instagram.com/stories/alexnklein/235848341696754...
You can reach out to me directly at alex at kano dot me
Alex
In 2006, the era of the motorola razr, if you told me everyone would be carrying a phone that weighs 2-3x, is well over double the size, and has 1/5 the standby time... I would not have understood why. People's tastes, habits, and lifestyles can change dramatically. I don't believe for a second a robust, modular, user-repairable, and maybe even upgradable phone would not fit into people's lives in a way that made them happy... but I also don't believe for a second that market forces will produce said phone. Much more money to be made on fragile luxury items that we replace as often as possible.
More than 5 billion dollars is spent by US schools in this way.
While the original Kano focused on "make your own" as an experience, the new Kano PC is "click in and click out" for sustainability as well as see-through-ness.
As WIRED put it, "What's a learning experience for the kids becomes a sustainability experiment for the schools." https://www.wired.com/story/kano-pc-microsoft-partnership/
Still love the Tardigrade module idea though, even if it's completely absurd.
http://midnightcommercial.com/project/tardigrade-biome/
Really wish more companies were working towards sustainable tech ideas, thinking about the pile of dead AirPods the average Apple customer will leave behind during their life fills me with anxiety.
This is also the best battery life you'll find at under $300, per Ars Technica.
A little chunkiness goes a long way ;)
Alex Klein, Cofounder & CEO, Kano
There's a discrepancy between the criteria of most people who write reviews about phones (and, of course, hardware in general) and 'regular' users, of which when it comes to phones I very much am one.
Technical reviewers - from Arts Technica to The Guardian - care about how speed, camera quality, form factor etc, compare to other such hardware of a similar price. A regular user who buys a phone every few years considers the device in itself, or at most to their old device. This seems fast, it takes nice photos, it fits in my hand. Plus whether they can afford it. This is not only a different set of criteria but a different kind: difference versus in-itself.
This problematises the supposed 'objectivity' of conventional technical reviews. It allows other criteria, ones which are difficult to quantify and therefore value, to become more important. For me: the value of never having to go through the stress of trying to pry a battery off the screen it's been glued to. The value of not having to order confusing parts from an ebay seller in China. The value of knowing that if something breaks, it'll be no problem to fix it myself. And also: the value of a supply chain which avoids exploitative practices.
I've come to think that tech reviews by speed wonks are inately problematic for this reason.
Their second version CrowPi 2 allows the use of any Raspberry Pi in a more laptop like hardware shell with 11.6" display. They also offering many sensors for additional IoT and hardware interfacing exercises. Currently they are on Kickstarter and more than 1600% funded [2][3].
[1]http://linuxgizmos.com/hackable-crowpi2-steam-education-lapt... [2]https://www.elecrow.com/ [3]https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/elecrow/crowpi2-steam-e...
AIUI slow deletion is an MS Windows thing.
A partial solution is offered here, https://superuser.com/questions/76906/deleting-large-amount-... -- command line deletion of files with output to 'nul' followed by pruning of directory trees is reportedly 3x faster.
these things run windows, which in and of itself gives substantially more nooks and crannies to poke at. the hardware is all modular and accessible and losable
from a technology education perspective, these look amazing. but the majority of technology in education is and should be about as interesting as a pencil.
I hope they keep doing stuff with P and Linux, so once my kids are older I will get them one
Alex Klein, Cofounder & CEO