"irrelevant or inappropriate messages sent on the Internet to a large number of recipients."
A non-trivial percentage of "first class" mail is actually spam. The difference is in quality of service (delivery times for first class is significantly faster in some circumstances then marketing).
I do agree that that there is value in daily mail delivery, but my point is that the value needs to be enhanced, rather then just continue in what it is today. Cut service where it doesn't make sense (go to every other day), encourage people to use email, which is way less wasteful, and less harmful for the environment, focus on rural routes.
The terrible thing - you CANNOT opt out of the junk mail, at least in the past (hopefully this has changed).
I have no interest in the USPS as a result. What type of business that is supposed to be providing a service FORCES its future and current customers to kill trees for junk mail that will go into the trash.
If the govt didn't allow for spam filters on email, email would be dying too.
https://www.mw-direct.com/blog/posts/first-class-mail-vs-sta...
And with EDDM you cannot get out of this spam blast.
Volume has nothing to do with revenue, which is precisely what the original poster pointed to and was being refuted:
> The USPS's primary revenue source is as a Spam delivery service.
But if are in a 50 unit building and you see those big stacks of advertising being plonked into the mailroom, that's what those are.