No institutional trust in policing caused organized crime to form long before prohibition was an issue. Police brutality is a seed of crime. It isn't like trolling where attention creates the problem but a tumor where ignoring it makes it grow from manageable to insurmountable.
Mechanically, they clearly aren't; they're passing through Facebook's servers and FB doesn't pretend to treat them as unfiltered content (in fact, the feed algorithm complaints are much older than the fact-checking complaints).
9/11 only happened once, and killed far fewer Americans than American police have since then. Therefore terrorism isn't a problem.
(This argument isn't false, but it's highly misleading!)
Neither position is an absurd one to take.
If you see a crack in a dam, and a rivulet of water coming through, you base your actions on whether you think it's going to become larger.
If a person is pretty certain that the dam is about to collapse, then talking about the water coming through right now seems palpably absurd, but reverse the assumptions and taking drastic action seems equally absurd.
There's no neutral way based on facts and independent of opinions to decide what's absurd, extreme, or hysterical. But at the same time, different views are different, and some are going to be severely wrong about anything controversial and important.
I don't know how you make a generic framework that tells you the right thing to do when people are talking about invading Iraq, and also tells you the right thing to do when people are talking about shutdowns for covid.