Suspect is arrested in grisly killing of tech CEO Fahim Saleh
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Amazing how far this is from all the early speculation. Also incredibly sad.
If it's a problem people would have moved to a better example, not a years old case.
OSINT is a thing. It's also pretty amazing.
It is something HN can't do though. Smart people let conspiracies rise to the top and fear making a mistake by correcting them.
The Reddit/Boston Marathon meme is a gate-keeping meme on OSINT. Don't lynch mob ever, but also don't fear intelligent speculation.
To be fair,
>Detectives believe that the killer, dressed in a black three-piece suit, wearing a black mask and carrying a duffel bag
The professional coordinated murderers of Mahmoud Al-Mabhouh were caught on surveillance cameras wearing totally unremarkable clothing. In real life, contract killers don't have uniforms. However I think it's interesting to consider the possibility that the killer in this case was essentially role-playing as a contract killer as portrayed by popular media.
What's intriguing to me is the idea that not only might the killer have been (consciously or unconsciously) role-playing a "professional", but that the police were engaging in the same fantasy.
There were under 200 homicides in NYC in 2020 (to date). Undoubtedly the slimmest minority (if any) were, in the way one imagines, "professional". So it seems safe to assume the homicide detectives might not have significant firsthand experience with which to say, "this seems like a professional job."
I'm reminded a little bit of the Bellagio "Biker Bandit" (https://lasvegassun.com/news/2011/aug/23/bellagio-bandit-get... whole thing seemed super professional (full-face motorcycle helmet, full body-suit, in-and-out in minutes)...but it turned out to be a dude with a gambling problem and an Oxy habit.
> Initially, Dubai authorities believed al-Mabhouh had died of natural causes.[44] Fawzi Benomran, the Dubai police coroner, said, "It was meant to look like death from natural causes during sleep." It took 10 days for the Dubai police to come to the conclusion that al-Mabhouh was assassinated. Benomran described the determination of the exact cause of death as "one of the most challenging cases" his department faced.[45]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Mahmoud_Al-Ma...
The team that killed him were on camera entering the country and in the hotel. However if they had been successful in convincing local authorities the death was natural, that would have made the (presumably very difficult to avoid) video evidence effectively irrelevant because nobody would have thought to consider it relevant.
I mean these guys are pros, right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Sergei_and_Yulia_...
And I always return to this story: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lillehammer_affair. If you can't count on the Mossad to have good opsec, who can you count on?
If anything, the impression that professionals do the job spotlessly seems like it goes hand-in-hand with the misattribution of this crime to a "professional."
From what's in the public record, even "professional" hitmen have their moments of conscience, laziness, procedural failures--and, apparently, quite frequently, presumably due to the moral pressure of conducting assassinations.
(Of course it's possible we don't hear about the hitmen who are truly pro-level, but I find that hard to believe.)
In this case, it was a $2.25 million condo. A suit and tie may be unremarkable clothing in that area.
Also, if Fahim was a jeans and t-shirt kind of guy like the numerous pictures of him suggest he may have been, the assistant may have normally been around the building in casual attire normally as well. A suit could have been out of character attire to mask his ID further.
I do think a lot of it comes down to one's tolerance for internet n00bs, popularity by upvotes rather than personal connection, an respect for influencers -- whether in the intellectual, professional, or stylistic realm.
Different strokes, I guess.
For me the fire hose of trending topics was too much, even with the occasionally fantastic post among them. So I rarely go there.
Then there are the really large communities covering subjects that interest me. I do subscribe to them but rarely interact because it's still a fire hose - responses to comments are really sensitive to the time of day and since I'm at least half to a full day off the timezone of the average community member, trying to interact is futile.
Then there are the smaller communities, usually tech for me. There is no longer that fire hose, and individuals are genuinely interested in learning something new, or sharing something new, often created by them. Add a number of this type of community and your daily feed becomes transformative.
And when you are looking to solve a problem, particularly one in an area you are not an expert in, it’s just so good. Niche subs have a wealth of information, help and offers of direct messaging to help solve problems. When you hit a helpful sub it’s infectious too, and you find yourself passing on the support you received when you see someone struggling.
I used to live in Stack Overflow for help, but the closed and shut down questions just kills things. ‘Duplicate of...,’ ‘Off-topic,’ ‘Needs details or clarity,’ ‘Needs more focus,’ or ‘Opinion-based‘. I wasn’t even postings, as I was sure that the septic tone would become focused on me.
I wish the HN guideline was “there’s no upside for anyone mentioning Reddit from an often glass house” instead of specifically calling out comparisons of this site to that one. When this forum dumps on Reddit, it walks away with an impression of superiority that could not be further from the truth. Observe my sibling. All forums have their problems and HN is not blessed with immunity.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23847195 is the main overall thread, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23848397 is another including smug necros, and there are many others.
At the same time, I would rather HN have a false sense of superiority that sometimes keeps it from descending to the depths as people at least make the attempt sometimes to keep it better than that, rather than just accept that it's often no different, and thus excuse that behavior when it happens.
That is, having the perception of superiority is helpful in as much as it allows comments like yours to have weight. Your comment on Reddit might be met with "well, duh, it's Reddit." Hopefully here some people are instead thinking about what they want this forum to be and whether they helped or hindered that. That's a bit pretentious of me to say, but I also think it's true.
> When this forum dumps on Reddit, it walks away with an
> impression of superiority that could not be further
> from the truth.
It could be further from the truth.Indeed. Because the cost of the deceased's apartment was mentioned, folks started grasping at straws, some assuming it's a politically motivated (with a vague implication that this may have been class warfare) killing.
And this site is way better than Reddit. In terms of maturity, intelligence, site rules, etc.
Though I don't really get what you seem to be upset about regarding the armchair detective work. The cops led with the same general theory. The victim actually _was_ american (correct me if I'm wrong here) but he did business in foreign countries.
* Downvoting is not available for everyone.
* No sub forums, so no fragmentation.
* Less known than Reddit meaning fewer trolls.
* No UI makeover :)
* Great admins.
I mean everyone in the crypto space probably knows or at least knows of someone who has been cut up and dismembered, so it's not really that crazy. A lot of people here are founders, so that's the kind of thing we naturally worry about. I.e. you can probably get a better valuation if you skip the middlemen and go straight to family offices, especially ones in foreign countries, but then again if you take money from Ron Conway and things go sideways he's probably not going to send people to kill you.
What HN certainly is, demographically, is majority Western. What you're seeing on China-related topics is the growing rift between China and the West, the same trend that shows up in Western media and no doubt Chinese media as well. I spend a lot of moderation time and energy arguing for understanding about this. But there's no way we can expect HN to be immune from macro social and geopolitical trends.
There's no reason to believe that "HN is incredibly xenophobic" except insofar as human beings in general may be.
> a lot of the American userbase on HN are not "well off"
Oh come on, get serious. This is a board focused on Tech, an industry where our the median/mean is well above almost any other field in the US.
HN is more varied than you're assuming. That is actually the leading problem facing the community. People develop a distorted image of what the HN community is, and then when they encounter posts that contradict their image, they resort to antagonistic explanations that are harmful.
The actual dynamic is this: many people here have wildly different backgrounds, and therefore strongly different views, than your own (I don't mean you personally, but all of us)—views which they come by as honestly as the rest of us come by ours. Yes there are bad actors, but users grossly overestimate the significance of that. We're far too quick to consign each other to the bad actor bucket, because we underestimate the variety and size of the genuine differences between us.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
I'm not consigning anyone to the "bad actor" bucket, but when we talk about filter bubbles we should at least be honest about the composition of groups and what traits they might have. There's no reason to think that the average HN user is representative of the average individual given the content.
Beyond that, due to the upvote system, the majority is amplified, so even if there are millions in poverty on this site, their views are going to be pushed lower than the tens of millions not in poverty. This is a bigger problem than HN obviously, but it does nobody any good to deny it's existence. The same could be applied to any minority group, whether its gender, sexuality, or race for that matter. This is a consequence of the system and you see the same thing on various subreddits (the fact that they split things into smaller boards mean there are communities where the site minority might be able to actually have a larger voice than the majority)
Edit: I was replying to the first version of your comment. I do disagree with the part you added later about upvotes. I think it is overinterpretation of the sort that feels-like-it-must-be-true, or feels-like-it's-probably-true. If there's one thing I've learned from moderating HN it's that those perceptions are extremely in the eye of the beholder and need to be bracketed if one wants to assess anything objectively.
p.s. Just to avoid misunderstanding, your account is still banned because you've continued to break HN's rules since we originally banned you. I restored your comments in this thread in order to reply to them. Users can also do that by vouching for good posts which shouldn't be [dead] (this is described at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html#cvouch).
While he said what he said and you refuted, I think the thought behind what he said was influenced by the rise in anti-Chinese xenophobia of late, and to my mind that is a real phenomenon both on HN and off of it. It is accompanied by, it must be said, a sharp increase in xenophobia in China as well.
I "agree" with the general xenophobia, meaning the lack of progress and backsliding toward China aligning with western democratic and individualistic ideals that I hold dear is very disappointing, but I can also see that indulging in one's xenophobic feelings might not lead to a desired outcome either.
I just say that because, counter to your last statement, there is reason to believe that HN has become incredibly xenophobic (compared to where it was a few years ago), which similar to what you also said, is accompanied by a qualifier.
And that's likely the case so in a way the GP was right. HN is rapidly approaching being large enough to represent a fair cross section of the communities it is active in, with the note that it skews wealthy, educated and tech oriented. Whether that slice of the population is more or less xenophobic as a rule is an open question. I fear for the answer.
Disliking the actions of the CCP doesn’t mean people are xenophobic any more than disliking Trump makes someone anti-American.
Compared to what? China?
Topics such as BLM often involve whataboutism with many complaining about the lack of support for Hong Kong by supporters of BLM, see Senator Hawley's comments.
This is part of the coordinated anti-globalism, nationalist movement that Bannon and his cronies are promoting.
I am not convinced that they actually care about Hong Kong or the Uihgurs given how opposed they were to helping out the Syrian migrants.
China is doing some bad shit, but it's hard for me to judge them much more severely than any number of other countries.
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-deta...
https://china.usembassy-china.org.cn/health-alert-u-s-consul...
What I don't support is when people use China as a tool to discredit movements like BLM because supporters aren't more broadly speaking out on injustices in other countries.
Bannon is strongly supportive of Russia even though the situation there is just as grim, see Chechnea, the loss of human rights for gays, and a Putin dictatorship of the country.
It's hard not to conclude that these criticisms are because China is a global economic power and a communist country.
It absolutely was due to his work in Nigeria.
Occam's razor certainly applied here. I wonder if that rampant speculation earlier shows how disconnected we are from reality. Our minds are certainly warped by the sugary fictions and media we consume.
Ya try to do someone a favor... maybe not for someone why stole 10s of thousands of dollars from you?
I wondered about that quote.
What are the odds a given law enforcement offical would ever even see / know the results of a "professional"?
The few "professional" folks I can think of historically, usually also dispose of the body...
Saleh's assistant Tyrese Haspil stole tens of thousands of dollars from him and instead of reporting him, he instead created a payment plan to be repaid.
Saleh showed compassion and that may have been a reason why he ended up dying in the end.
Yes, that's exactly what happened.
Lesson: report the crime to the police first. If you want to show compassion and keep the law out of your business, you can always refuse to cooperate with the investigation later, and they'll be obliged to drop the charges. But the perpetrator will know that they'll be at the top of the list if anything happens to you.
Instead, just tell your friends and family.
I anal but isn’t that a pretty slippery slope? Like someone rapes me or tries to kill me and the law will throw me in prison for refusing to relive those moments?
Also I’m pretty sure jstor didn’t want to press charges but the overzealous prosecutors did horrible things to Aaron Swartz anyways.
Yes, judges and lawyers for both parties in a case can legally compel witnesses to show up and testify, but doing so tends to damage the credibility of the witness, which can be fatal for their testimony.
Its also used to hold political prisoners the government doesn't like in order to punish them.
The district attorney for New Orleans, Leon Cannizzaro, has come under fire for not only issuing "fake subpoenas" that threaten jail time, he's actually arrested the victims and kept them incarcerated until trial in some cases.
He's still DA there, somehow.
It gives judges and prosecutors a lot of leeway in how they handle cases.
Consider this situation: Alan assaults his partner Beth. He is reported by a neighbour, and Beth cooperates.
But Alan is an abuser who knows all of the tricks for exerting mental, emotional, and physical control over Beth. He convinces her to say nothing in court.
Some people argue—correctly—that threatening Beth with consequences for failing toi testify truthfully about the events she recounted to police when questioned is hurting the victim.
Others argue—also correctly—that without being able to compel victims like Alice to follow-through with the prosecution, we enable and even encourage domestic abusers to witness-tamper.
I don’t know that there is one easy works-in-all-circumstances approach.
> just tell your friends and family
But then the dangerous person won't know that they know?
Or one would tell him "btw I've told my partner and parents about this"? -- hmm I'd be worried I then created risk for them
I hope we still live in a world where "have fallback measures in case other people are going to murder you" doesn't need to be at the top of our contingency planning. Obviously it was here, and that's tragic, but I think and hope that most of us shouldn't need to learn to anticipate this as a likely, or even plausible, response.
I worked at a Lebanese company in London and a lot of directors had the special versions of their cars, the ones with runflat tires and up armoured.
I recall we had someone kidnaped in Beirut and they got him back quickly.
Why do they need those cars in London?
(HNW = High-net-worth individual, I didn't know)
Sure, if you only consider murder, then it's unlikely (in America at least). But this same pattern happens for lesser things. Someone hits your car, and says "can we just settle this privately, I don't want my premium to go up", and you agree out of kindness, and a few days later you get a letter saying that they're making a claim against your insurance. You've missed your chance to get yourself on record as the victim.
In this case, or similar cases, the guy might have done other things like accuse him of blackmail, or accuse him of being involved in the crime etc.
Notwithstanding the risk of being compelled to testify, I would still take the route I mentioned above (report it but refuse to cooperate any further). I'd be surprised if the prosecutor decided to press ahead and grant you immunity to make you testify if you're not willing. You could retract your statement, which would signify that they cannot predict what you'll say at trial. Much more likely they'd just drop the case if the victim is unwilling...but I'm not a lawyer, I could be wrong.
No this has happened to me and I won ultimately anyway. In California they ask people to immediately get out of the road if they can (i.e. move their cars), and generally deal with it privately if it's under some dollar amount. All states have some variant of this.
If the person then comes after you it will be decided between the insurance companies who directly investigate the car and take statements. In my case I explained what happened and pointed out how the scratches/dents/etc supported it.
As for playing games with the police, filing a false police report is a crime so be very careful about changing your official statements with them. I'd say talk to a lawyer to advise you on exactly what to say, of perhaps even have them deal directly to get you out of it.
When people retaliate against victims for reporting them, it's generally because there's a long game that they're concerned about. It could be an organized crime outfit that's concerned about it's future, it's reputation etc. Or an abusive partner who expects to be able to continue the abuse long term, so they want to "nip it in the bud" when someone talks to the police. So even though they may get in more trouble for the retaliation, they think it's worth it in the long term. The victims in these cases are usually captive in some sense.
Imo, generally when you're the victim of an unexpected crime, you're safer reporting to the authorities than you would be keeping quiet about it.
I wish we had an option for restorative justice. This is exactly what the victim would have wanted.
The police are just men with guns that anybody can call. They're only really useful in any other situation where men with guns are useful, like breaking up a brawl.
This is completly false at least in the US where this story is happening. You don't decide to press or not to press charges. The presecution can decide to go ahead or not, no matter if you cooperate or not and no matter what you desire, they have no obligation whatsoever.
The real lesson is that nobody should take the law into their own hands. Putting a criminal on a repayment program is a terrible idea especially with covid-19 economic crisis and so many people struggling to survive. During tough times, you should expect the worst of human nature.
This. He wanted to give that guy a second chance by not involving the authorities, which shows how good hearted Saleh was.
The murderer needs to spend the rest of his life in prison, for a crime he obviously premeditated.
depending upon your Ideas around morality, that means one or more of punishment because “an eye for an eye,” punishment because of some debatable ideas around deterrence, removal from society because the murder is a threat to commit more crimes, and/or rehabilitation because life in prison does nothing except enrich prison contractors at the expense of taxpayers.... Or because civilized societies try to rehabilitate wrongdoers wherever it is a realistic possibility.
All that being said, this particular person is innocent until proven guilty. But ideally the murderer—whoever they are—will end up with one or more of these consequences, administered in a fair and transparent manner.
Surely the murderer, by definition, isn't innocent? The suspect they have might be though.
Unless you believe the justice system is wrong and nobody who does that crime should be convicted for it. In that case, it's standing up for what you believe in at the only opportunity you have to do so.
1) That jail time will prevent long term future victims (it won't) 2) That jail will rehabilitate him (it won't) 3) That being compassionate will cause him to commit more crimes. In this case it did, however, I believe this is a pretty big outlier.
Or Salah thought that he probably wouldn't get his money back if Haspil was arrested, so he made a deal with him.
Can someone explain what this is? I assumed the guy would quickly be suspect #1 once they combed through Saleh's computer and found discussions about the stolen money. What's this "anti-felon identification cards" reference about?
> So in 1993 the AFID system was created. Now, when many Taser guns are fired, they disperse dozens of colourful anti-felon identification (AFID) tags, which resemble confetti and are printed with tiny serial numbers. It would be very time-consuming to pick all the tags up and so inevitably the police are able to find some and trace the (TASER) gun that was used.
https://www.mentalfloss.com/uk/law/31712/why-is-there-confet...
https://www.mentalfloss.com/uk/law/31712/why-is-there-confet...
Here is an interesting tidbit:
> In order to track the weapon’s use, the cartridges containing the projectile darts are given serial numbers. When fired, the projectiles are accompanied by 20 to 30 vibrantly colored circular paper tags, a little smaller than one-quarter inch in diameter. The tag is known as an AFID with each AFID bearing a serial number printed on it corresponding to the serial number of the cartridge from which it was fired. Despite the bright colors of the AFIDs, their size makes them very difficult to detect. This presentation demonstrates a method for locating the released AFIDs using an alternate light source.
tl;dr: Tasers' use is traceable and identifiable. The assistant probably didn't know that.
It turns out Tasers spew many little tags with unique identifiers on them when fired.
Stunning, sad and macabre. Nothing else to say.
The coverage of this story reminds me of this tweet:
https://twitter.com/ComicDaveSmith/status/127987036677366169...
> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8534097/Murdered-Ne...
The NYT wouldn't have hesitated to publish Tyrese's photo had he been white and Fahim had been black. Probably their respective races would have even been mentioned in the headline.
> Detectives believe that the killer, dressed in a black three-piece suit, wearing a black mask and carrying a duffel bag, followed Mr. Saleh off an elevator in his building and into his apartment, a law enforcement official said. He used a Taser to immobilize Mr. Saleh and then stabbed him to death.
It appears the security of the elevator opening directly into the victim's apartment and the COVID-19 crisis (the suspect was wearing a black mask) both played a role.
Police allege the accused 1) disguised self [article implies video evidence suggested victim did not recognize the accused], 2) followed victim onto elevator [faked pressing button for different floor], 3) followed victim off elevator, 4) incapacitated victim using taser [which, it turns out, spews owner identifying material when fired], 5) stabbed victim to death, 6) left scene [multiple times?] to procure materials for cleaning of crime scene, 7) may have been interrupted in the cleaning of crime scene by victim's sister who, 8) called police upon discovering brother's partially dismembered corpse.
On the flip side, I'd be nervous as hell about being recognized if I was the assistant.
Despite the victim "knowing" the suspect as an employee, I find it easy to imagine him not recognizing his employee who had a fairly average build, in a fairly common outfit, in an elevator with people being conditioned to keep as much distance as possible. How often do you closely look at fellow elevator riders' faces? Especially these days?
That being said, with the brief tenure assumed, it's incredible that the CEO would be willing to work so flexibly with a relatively new employee who stole what amounted to up to 100K.
I find it hard to imagine to be honest. If they tracked him down because he bought the Taser and other items, but don't have a clear ID from the CCTV and DNA, it's possible that the assistant hired someone for the dirty job and provided him with the tools?
> One of the officials said Mr. Saleh had paid Mr. Haspil so well that he had been able to pay off the debts of several family members.
The train of thought that takes that to the comment
> The article mentions the stolen money was used to pay off family debts. He allegedly murdered Mr. Saleh after he was caught and fired.
must make sense in some degree to the comment author
Interesting that human information copying is subject to such large transcription errors over such a short period of time.
This, so often. The amount of pain, heartbreak, and trauma caused by relatively-meaningless amounts of money, which a family would easily part with if it kept their loved one alive.
Wow, that’s really sad.
I'd never heard of it. Wow... $10M run rate for a website that sends prank calls to others? Like "Chinese Apology" "Indian Tech Support"? Talk about a site that should be cancelled: https://www.prankdial.com/?category=services
Good podcast on it if anyone cares.
After all, maybe he didn't originally intend to kill the guy, he did start by tasing him.
Details here: https://statelaws.findlaw.com/new-york-law/new-york-first-de...
Having to refile with lesser charges gives the defense an advantage because they can tell the jury "look even the prosecution doesn't believe they have enough evidence of my clients guilt!"
Because with initial charges, when you've got pretty solid probable cause for intent (2nd degree), there's no reason to take any risk at the probable cause hearing with premeditation (1st degree); if you've got evidence that you think can get a conviction on that as you investigate, upgrading charges is easy.
It's really, really hard to get prove exactly what someone was thinking. You need a very concrete piece of evidence that proves intent, just going somewhere is not going to be enough.
How about going there completely disguised, and pretending to go to a different floor in the building than Fahim? If he went there to talk to him, he wouldn't press a button in the elevator for a different apartment.
Even weapons being brought could have been intended for threatening future violence.
It's incredibly hard to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, what someone's mindset is at any given time.
Don't screw with the person who knows your whole life in and out, I guess.
Oh wow .. I remember that site. Man, this entire situation just stinks :(.
I knew Fahim personally. I know people who spoke to him the day of about this very issue, so I have some information that most people don't. I absolutely do not believe this kid did it.
Fahim was well liked in Nigeria but he was disrupting a dangerous market.
Tyrese had recently purchased and signed for the taser that was used in the attack. He was at home depot buying cleaning supplies right after the murder. That's some very significant evidence.
1) For one thing, he was not the only running a well funded motorcycle transportation business in Nigeria.
2) He had already pivoted into last-mile delivery and again he was not the only one running a well funded one
3) Let's even assume his motorcycle transportation was disrupting a dangerous market, it is basically the same market that Uber and those before Uber disrupted in Nigeria and nothing like this happened
It just makes our law enforcement people look incompetent.
> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8534097/Murdered-Ne...
Somehow this feels dirty & cheap.
https://pageone.ng/2020/07/17/breaking-here-is-the-face-of-t...
There's nothing wrong with this. Hacker News doesn't need karma police. Stop.
Also, you're actively suppressing African news sources, so I question your bias?
It's much more likely that the assistant was either blackmailed or paid a much larger amount by a 3rd party to carry this out, potentially stealing the money from him to provide an alternative motive. The way the crime was carried out might be some signature card that people involved will recognized and see as a warning.
The thought that someone would kill someone with this level of professionalism without external leverage is questionable. Especially since only tens of thousands of dollars was involved in the alleged strife. If I were looking for a perfect fall-guy, this is a home run of a way to knock someone off and then have a "lovers revenge" type cover sweep everything out of the limelight.
Then I became a senior high schooler, and we had a biology class where we need to open up a frog. It was a group project.
After I opened up the frog, there’s no way for us to fix the frog anymore. Then I rip the frog even more apart, from skinning it completely to cutting it in many ways to the bone and skull to “learn more”.
My friends in my group were a bit horrified with what I did and they said I looked like I enjoyed it.
It was until a few days later it dawned on me like “how was I able to do that without any disgust, not only that, but with an interested curious somewhat happy look on my face? I am a psycho!”
In fact, what's really likely is that that 3rd party is being manipulated by lizard overlords to make us believe there are still humans with agency in the world when actually they have brainwave modifiers that override everything we want to do.
With Neuralink, I won't even be able to say these seditious things. Celebrate your last few moments of free will!
And why would the kid steal the money to “provide a motive”? Paid killers aren’t pokinhv to establish motive. That’s crazy town territory.
In the end tho, to end up dead and dismembered from this, this guy is still very unlucky.
That's going to increase the base number of those with some flavor of mental instability, but I've never seen anything to suggest the ratio is different than other places.
For NYC specifically: about 60k out of America's 500k homeless people live in New York City, which is the highest homeless population of any US city [2]. The "large majority of street homeless New Yorkers are people living with mental illness or other severe health problems" [3].
These sources confirm what I think a lot of people have seen for themselves through personal travel and experience: mental illness/instability correlates with urbanization.
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5374256/
[2] https://www.statista.com/chart/6949/the-us-cities-with-the-m...
[3] https://www.coalitionforthehomeless.org/basic-facts-about-ho...
NYC = crazy
I lived there.
It doesn't matter if they have public social media profiles, a bunch of accolades, or not. There is a group of people that carry tasers in their purse for a sense of security, theoretically putting the people that don't carry purses at all at more risk.
You can also have a healthy relationship.
YMMV. Its actually pretty random and potential dates miss many connections if they resort to overfitting to reduce potential strife. The end.