Hacker News Reader

I think the problem here is that the introduction of payment changes the psychology from one of sharing information to one of maximizing income (gift Vs capital). In the latter mode of operation the quality of the information is a secondary concern.

View on HN

I had similar misgivings/feelings while using the product. However: Two observations: 1.) they did include user-selected charities lately in their distribution of "upvote" profits; 2.) The point is less about making money, more about adverse selection (keeping out trolls). Nobody could subsist off of this in any real kind of way. If they did--the value they would have to provide would be immense.

Hopefully the small amounts we are dealing with makes it less worthwhile for spammers as well as not seem like a purely profit driven incentive. All things in moderation as they say.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com