BTW, I have to guess that your logic doesn't apply when the US refuse its data to go to China. Are you also saying that this is also pure US protectionism in disguise?
BTW, I have to guess that your logic doesn't apply when the US refuse its data to go to China. Are you also saying that this is also pure US protectionism in disguise?
> BTW, I have to guess that your logic doesn't apply when the US refuse its data to go to China.
This is the more hilarious aspect of this. EU and US intelligence agencies share huge amounts of information. If an EU citizen is spied on by say, France. Not only are they not going to know it’s happening, not only is there essentially nothing they can do about it, but the French government are more than happy to share anything they find with the NSA [0]. If the EU actually had a legitimate concern about US intelligence gaining access to EU citizen data, then these intelligence sharing arrangements would be illegal.
This ruling doesn’t prevent US agencies from spying on EU citizens. The only thing it achieves is forcing US companies to do more business in the EU.
[0]: https://theintercept.com/2018/03/01/nsa-global-surveillance-...