I also hope these incidents remind people of how little control you really have over your online identity. We're all just IDs in a database somewhere, waiting to be impersonated. Decentralization is the only solution for this IMO.
I also hope these incidents remind people of how little control you really have over your online identity. We're all just IDs in a database somewhere, waiting to be impersonated. Decentralization is the only solution for this IMO.
I don't think there is any solution to this. "Decentralization" in this context seems equivalent to a centralized system that simply gives up on any ability to recover accounts. Whoever owns the authentication details of an account is the owner, period. If you lose the password or the account gets hacked and stolen from you, tough shit. Start a new account.
I think the real solution is that social media should simply be valued lower. No one should care if their Twitter account gets hacked. The fact that politicians and important people use it in an official capacity is the problem that needs fixing.
I don't disagree, but with what?
It's easy to say this is 'wrong/broken', but I don't see a great fix other than people 'rolling their own solution' and that's not realistic.
Post it on congress.gov using some inefficient boring process or whatever the official communication method of your role is.
As far as I’m aware they didn’t even make him create a new one and he thought everything was totally fine.
It was the moment where I realized I want nothing to do with IT Management/Security in the future and am actively working to distance myself from that aspect.
The reason why this attack worked is primarily because of a recovery system. I agree this is a significant vector, but I can't see how decentralized solves this?
At the moment with blockchain wallets, once you've lost your private key, you're screwed. There is no recovery.
So, I'm all for decentralized but if it is truly my identity, I need a way back if I lose it. Not sure how to solve that vector even in a decentralized case.
Do I need to upload my identity to specific 'verifiers'?
I read @elonmusk because I trust it's him and I'm interested in what he says. Personally, I genuinely like Starship + Starlink updates... I ignore most the other stuff. But still, I want to see those awesome rocket tweets!
So, I want to know what he says.
He can change his username because it got hacked/whatever... but then I personally have to see what he changed it to... how do I know that he is the one who changed it? how do i know it's not some rando dude impersonating him?
You could trust it was Elon because it's published on his own website instead of on the worst thing to happen to human communication since writing was invented (I.e., Twitter)
For other cases we can evaluate merit based on previous performance and character of published material instead of "identity". I do not care who is behind a pseudonymous blog if the blog is good.
Obviously you can scale up your security according to the value of your account and your threat model.
We need to keep the conversation in recovery because eventually it'll happen. Your 5/9 people could have n+1 unwilling parties where n is the losable amount.
It is unrealistic to say it will _never_ happen.
When my identity is lost... is it lost for good? how do i recover?
If it's lost for good, and i make a new 'identity' then what is my 'identity'... is it just... my reddit username?
Give enough people using the system, it's not if, it's when. So how do I recover?