Imagine if the hackers timed the intrusion during github outage, and twitter's employees can't deploy a fix for the exploit fast enough because github was down!
Edit: they tweeted from the twitter support account. Just wow. They might have actually gotten into Twitter’s systems.
Edit 2: To expand on my edit above, I saw multiple tweets from other accounts that showed a screenshot of the scam tweet originating from the twitter support account. I’m not sure if it’s real or not, since they keep deleting the tweets. If it is real that would definitely open doors to more theories.
Edit 3: Seems like the twitter support account was a joke. Impossible to tell with everything going on!
[edit: not sure why this is getting so much silent attention. It is a literal translation of the tweet referenced in OP.]
I'm not sure the FB counts as democratic. At best he's big shades of gray with contradicting indications.
Out of the top four richest tech billionaires, according to forbes, only one of them is not most likely conservative and that one tries to stay out of politics, i.e. bill gates.
The next two have clear conservative leanings or contradicting indications, i.e. Bezos and Zuck.
Number four is Larry Ellison, who recently hosted a trump fundraiser. Well here is what wikipedia has on him:
Politics
Ellison was critical of NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden, saying that "Snowden had yet to identify a single person who had been 'wrongly injured' by the NSA's data collection".[85] He has donated to both Democratic and Republican politicians,[86] and in late 2014 hosted Republican Senator Rand Paul at a fundraiser at his home.[87][88]
Ellison was one of the top donors to Conservative Solutions PAC, a super PAC supporting Marco Rubio's 2016 presidential bid. As of February 2016, Ellison had given $4 million overall to the PAC.[89] In 2020, Ellison hosted a fundraiser for Donald Trump at his Rancho Mirage estate.[90][91]
2. Most don't publicly support GOP because they don't want to get cancelled.
PREFERENCE FALSIFICATION: Preference falsification is the act of misrepresenting one’s wants under perceived social pressures.
Most billionaires and large corporations have connections in, and make donations to, both major parties. The people who are critical of billionaires and corporations tend to also be the people that point out that the dominant faction of the Democratic Party (less sophisticated members of the critical group will shorten this to just the Democratic Party, without making the factional distinction) has for decades been, in economic policy terms, a center-right pro-corporate neoliberal group, not a progressive one.
We are aware of a security incident impacting accounts on Twitter. We are investigating and taking steps to fix it. We will update everyone shortly.
Are you implying that this was tweeted by the attackers? or something else?
Especially after the last insider account tampering event.
It could be SQL injection writing tweets directly to the database for all we know.
I agree with everyone else saying the site should be pulled. Incredibly sketchy.
Maybe we'll get a leetcode question out of it, how much should you risk your career for after taking a job at a FAANG?
Given that most FANGers are obsessed with cash, I'm pretty sure they'd say "yes" to risking their career for some sweet BTC.
From - https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/jgxd3d/twitter-insider-ac...
> Only doing this for the next 30 minutes! Enjoy.
No, it's hacker's doing, they need to keep timestamps updated
Imagine that. At that point it would be more secure to self-host the code off of GitHub to push that critical fix Twitter sorely needs right now.
Its still on going as we type.
I sincerely doubt Twitter depends on github.com. Github's enterprise version runs on your own infra, self-managed, and if Twitter uses GH at all, that'd be the version they use.
Do you mean that they prefer using managed services? Or do you mean that the services managed by their internal IT utlize AWS/etc for servers as opposed to on premises.
Like you are able to launch Adobe Photoshop because Okta says so. :)
Also begs the question, who is liable in such cases....
The hackers could be deep in Twitters systems, eventually even have even someone working at Twitter, or it's a result of a new yet unknown password list or phishing attempt.
Means they had someone inside Twitter.
Elon Musk, Barack Obama and Wiz Khalifa just tweeted the scam again this very minute, more than an hour since it started. This is backend access, Twitter can't figure out how to shut it down.
Is Twitter really using GitHub internally (even self-hosted)?