He was still not born in Bangladesh nor did he live there, but he lived and grew up in America. This article didn't mention a single word of Bangladesh, it was still mentioned by the root comment merely for ideological purposes.
Sure, and all OP wrote is
> (his original country)
Though it's not 100% correct, it's easy to see how someone's family coming from there would be summarized as their "original country."
> it was still mentioned by the root comment merely for ideological purposes.
What ideology? All the OP pointed out was that this person had strong ties to Bangladesh, both in heritage in business, and that extremists from that country use the same technique for murder as this man suffered. That seems clearly like relevant context.
No he didn't, can you quote that part for us please?